First Glimpse of the Ocean Floor Near the Refugio Spill Site

We are interested in assessing the ocean floor near the oil spill site for the presence of any tarballs, oiled plant life, or signs of affected wildlife. After pursuing the proper channels, we were not given permission to enter the oil spill site. Without a clear idea as to the condition of the ocean floor, we partnered with Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, and set out to examine the area that is just outside the closed areas.

Ben (SB Channel Keeper DIrector), Tim, Paul, Chris and Blake. (AARR)

We set out aboard the R/V Channel Keeper with their program director Ben.

20150604_103516

After some precipitation from the previous night, and from a plankton bloom, visibility was poor. We were unable able to survey all of our intended sites, but we were able to get the area directly off shore from the spill site.

We did not see any evidence of oil visually. We plan on heading out again next week to further investigate the ocean floor proximal to the beach closures.

 

Exxon: Drive rather than Pipe

McCormix Oil Tanker TruckOne of the many policy consequences of the 1969 Santa Barbara Oil was a strong regulator of oil drilling and transportation at the county level in Santa Barbara County.  Santa Barbara County’s Planning and Development Department’s powerful Energy Division is an amazingly strong office with a suite of powerful permitting and oversight tools across oil and gas production in the county.  This office directly emerged from the fallout of the 1969 spill.  Moreover, the heightened concern that the 1969 spill brought to us all merged with numerous other concerns in the 1970s:

  • growing awareness of the importance of the Santa Barbara Channel as an amazingly diverse migratory corridor for virtually all of the large whales that live in the eastern Pacific
  • very high numbers/rate of tanker traffic in and around the Santa Barbara Channel
  • the acknowledgement that pipelines (despite their known risks and the fact no transportation mode is perfect) are the safest method to move gases and liquids in the U.S.

These swirling forces resulted in terrestrial pipelines being the mode of choice for the crude produced in the Santa Barbara Channel and various pipelines being created or adding on additional spurs throughout the 1980s, creating the pipeline network that we have now.  This brings crude from coastal collection/distribution facilities to refineries in Santa Barbara and Kern Counties.  See the map and detail below:

Oil and gas facilities across Santa Barbara (and extreme western Ventura and southern San Luis Obispo Counties).

Oil and gas facilities across Santa Barbara (and extreme western Ventura and southern San Luis Obispo Counties). Source: Santa Barbara County Planning Division.

Detail of above map.

Detail of above map.

So our moving of crude via pipelines has reduced the risk of a maritime spill, but made us dependent on (effectively) a “single lane” highway for crude: the All American Coastal Pipeline.  Obviously that is now down thanks to the May 19th break of trunk 901.  In the week following the spill, an essentially identical trunk line (903) that brings crude to Kern County was deactivated over concerns that a similar break was possible given identical maintenance records, similar pipeline thinning, etc.  This seems prudent given all the concerns about insufficient maintenance/oversight and all the hallmarks of what will be a huge political theater of a legal investigation.  This has driven local production wells to be greatly staunched.  Wellheads feeding into the Plains pipeline have been slowed to about a quarter of their normal flow rates.  Currently that oil is being stored in the onshore facility (Las Flores Canyon, just to the right of the Refugio pipeline break in the above figures) very close to the break at Refugio.  But even at this reduced production level, we will run out of onsite storage within 10-14 days.

This all brings us to yesterday when Exxon petitioned that ol’ Energy division at County Planning for permission to start trucking oil.  And we are talking a lot of trucks.  As in 192 more truck trips per day on the Gaviota stretch of the 101.  As the LA Times is reporting this morning:

The company told Santa Barbara County officials Thursday that it wants to send a fleet of 5,000-gallon tanker trucks along U.S. 101 at a frequency of eight trucks per hour, 24 hours a day, every day, said Kevin Drude, the head of the county’s energy division.

“They are totally pinched off right now,” Drude said. “The only way out of the county is through that pipeline network.”

This will proceed until the pipeline can both be fixed AND certified for routine operation.  The current estimate is months.  Good luck with that, by the way.

Not to digress into other PIRatE Lab research, but we can add to the list of impacts from this spill all the increased road kill that will spin-up out of this increased trucking efforts.  Large trucks such as these crude tankers are the least nimble vehicles out there and are much more likely to kill large wildlife.  So while this may be inevitable given the options on the table, increased road-associated mortality is going to happen.  This should be an additional factor in the mix added to the actual impact of this spill.  My lab can actually estimate the amount of increased animal kill rates from this increased traffic…although we are still on the beach at the moment covered in tar balls.  Stay tuned.

Road kill badger Hueneme Road 10-11-09c

American badger kiled by vehicles on Hueneme Road in Ventura County’s Oxnard Plain. October 11, 2009. More vehicle trips = more animals killed.

OpenROV Live Posting

Open ROV & Vest

We will attempt to post info about our subsurface trials of our deposited oil surveys here today, assuming we have connectivity.

 https://openexplorer.com/expedition/refugio/#post-3663017

   

  

  

  

Ormond Beach Tar

Dr. Clare Steele & ESRM students at Ormond (Arnold Road site) on June 3, 2015.

Dr. Clare Steele & ESRM students at Ormond (Arnold Road site) on June 3, 2015.

 

We sampled our two beach sites at Ormond Beach yesterday.  As with our beaches in west Ventura County, we found a generally light to moderate tarring along the strand line.  It was consistently patchy with the majority of the beach being only lightly tarred.  We did also detect an oily sheen within the sand matrix towards our Arnold Road sites, indicating the beach was hit with a slick in addition to more weathered tar in the last several days.

We found a dead round skate and a California sea lion within the wash zone when we arrived in the early morning.  As you would expect in June, we had relatively few shorebirds, but noted several California least tern breeding pairs and many snowy plovers.  Most plovers were back in amongst our dune complex, but a few were outside in the main beach area.  While I saw the plovers frequently running in and out of the tar/wrackline, I did not see any direct feeding within the tar or direct interactions with the tar itself.

Tar clean-up teams had not yet arrived to clean-up Ormond at the time of our surveys.  They were slated to arrive the next day, June 4.

Dr. Don Rodriguez's hands covered in a light oil sheen following our regular sand coring, indicating an oil sheen hit the beach sometime in the preceding several days.  June 3, 2015

Dr. Don Rodriguez’s hands covered in a light oil sheen following our regular sand coring, indicating an oil sheen hit the beach sometime in the preceding several days. June 3, 2015.

Moderate tar strandline at Ormond Beach. June 3, 2015.

Moderate tar strandline at Ormond Beach. June 3, 2015.

A dead California sea lion at Ormond Beach.  This individual was newly located this morning as the tide receded.  This photograph was taken several hours later after turkey vultures had begin to attack the carcass.  No external oil was evident.  There was a similar lack of oil in the nasal and oral cavities.  June 3, 2015.

A dead California sea lion at Ormond Beach. This individual was newly located this morning as the tide receded. This photograph was taken several hours later after turkey vultures had begin to attack the carcass. No external oil was evident. There was a similar lack of oil in the nasal and oral cavities. June 3, 2015.

 

It keeps coming…

Now we are seeing additional tar balls in Long Beach (in southern Los Angeles County).

This tarring pattern has become all too familiar.  We think we are done with the oil “rain,” then we get a highly patchy deposition event which tars beaches with moderate to light tar balls (and occasionally an oil sheen).  The event produces a highly variable deposition over several miles of coastline.  In turn, this leads some of the public who happened upon a relatively high concentration of tar balls  to say “oh my God, there is so much tar here compared to what we normally see here…this is horrible” and others who happen upon a low or non-existent level of tar say “oh my God, this is nothing and totally overblown…this is such a manufactured crisis.”  The Joint Incident Command will issue a press release saying it will take a long-time to chemically fingerprint the oil (see my previous post), but they will treat it as related to the Refugio oil spill until they get evidence otherwise.  They will then send in a bunch of contractors to walk the beach/pick-up the tar.

We saw this happen in southern Santa Barbara County.  Then northern Los Angeles County (the mid Santa Monica Bay/South Bay Cities).  Then Ventura County.  Then along the Malibu Coast…and now southern Los Angeles County.  If this petroleum is not pipeline oil, it is an amazing coincidence.

As of four hours ago, the LA Times is reporting:

Four miles of Long Beach coast closed after tar balls wash ashore

A four-mile stretch of the coast in Long Beach was closed Wednesday evening after tar balls washed ashore, threatening the safety of beachgoers, authorities said.

The small pieces of tar began spotting the sand earlier in the day between 1st Place and 72nd Place, said city fire department spokesman Jake Heflin.

Cleanup crews are working to remove the tar, he said.

The U.S. Coast Guard has collected samples of the tar balls for testing, which will help pinpoint the source of the petroleum product. Officials said there was no sign that the tar balls came from operations by the Long Beach Gas and Oil Department.

Laboratory testing will help investigators determine whether the tar traveled from Santa Barbara County, where a May 19 oil spill released as much as 101,000 gallons of crude. An estimated 21,000 gallons of oil spewed into the Pacific.

In recent days, tar balls have washed ashore in Ventura County, Malibu and the South Bay, where a nearly eight-mile section of the beach was closed for three days last week.

Long Beach city officials have advised people to stay away from beaches, cautioning that the tar may irritate skin or cause longterm health effects.

Da Grunion be here!

June 2nd and 3rd are the peak spawning days of the year for our California grunion in 2015.  These fish are laying eggs and sperm as I type this into some of our newly tarred high tide lines across SoCal.

Grunion eggs Marina Park 06-05-15c

California grunion eggs from about 1″ down into the sand at Marina Park (Ventura Harbor), Ventura County.

California grunion running at Marina Park beach in Ventura, CA at 23:00 on June 6, 2015

California grunion running at Marina Park beach in Ventura, CA at 23:00 on June 6, 2015.

Welcome to the Jungle

My idealistic, structured, self-sufficient world was shattered this week. As we discuss the various frames with which to view organizations, the political frame has been the forefront of my mind. I am one to avoid company/office politics, as far as […]

Gearing up for ROV surveys

We are prepping for our first subtidal surveys for tar/crude and to vett our newest OpenROV platforms for rapid spill surveys/response.

 

see our AARR blog: http://aarr.piratelab.org

Pathos And The Mounting Pressure To Do Something

Facebook posting of dead dolphin in Ventura in the wake of the Refugio Oil Spill.

Facebook posting of dead dolphin in Ventura in the wake of the Refugio Oil Spill.

The media and public are apparently getting more and more worried about marine mammals and birds fouled or killed by oil spilled from the May 19 pipeline break.  At least part of this current worry can be traced to pictures that began showing up on Facebook late last week of heavily oiled dolphins (or at least one or two) near Ventura State Beach and the constant drip, drip of implied or direct accusations of ineptness, delay, or other failings of the response.  Now the Santa Barbara Independent is reporting that the recorded mammal deaths rose sharply by Monday June 1:

On Monday alone, responders organized by the California Department of Fish & Wildlife and the Oiled Wildlife Care Network recovered the bodies of 30 dead sea birds (mostly brown pelicans) and 13 marine mammals (mostly sea lions).  Five oiled birds and two mammals were found alive.

Since May 19, nine dead dolphins — some with mouths full of tar — have washed onto South Coast beaches.  A total of 45 mammals and 80 birds have been found dead in the last two weeks. Of the 57 live birds and 38 mammals rescued, eight birds and seven mammals died in care.  Body counts for fish, crustaceans, and other types of intertidal animals were not immediately available.

Total Birds 137
Birds recovered: live 57
Birds recovered: dead 80
Total Mammals 82
Mammals affected: live 38
Mammals dead 45

Conspicuous vertebrates impacted by the Refugio Oil Spill. Data from May 19-June 1, 2015. Source: Joint Incident Command.

 

Dolphin kill that washed up in Ventura in the wake of the May 19, 2015 Refugio Oil Spill.  Image source: Naples News.

Dolphin kill that washed up in Ventura in the wake of the May 19, 2015 Refugio Oil Spill. Image source: Naples News.

To be sure this spill has impacted and undoubtedly will be impacting many more conspicuous marine vertebrates in the days to come.  We should be counting these impacts, working to minimize further impacts, and (post clean-up) restoring these systems.  With every picture and data point, the pressure to do something can seem tremendous.  We all feel this.  But rushing to judgement as to what happened, while understandable, rarely produces the best possible policy response.

A pelican covered in oil sits on a beach about a mile west of Refugio State Beach, Calif., Wednesday, May 20, 2015. A broken onshore pipeline spewed oil down a storm drain and into the ocean for several hours Tuesday before it was shut off. (Kenneth Song/The News-Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT; SANTA MARIA TIMES OUT

A pelican covered in oil sits on a beach about a mile west of Refugio State Beach, Calif., Wednesday, May 20, 2015. Image: Kenneth Song/The News-Press via AP.

Clearly those in the media spotlight (e.g. Plains All American, the Joint Incident Command) seek to tamp down speculation and minimize the hit to their public image.  On the other side, advocates for reduced dependence on oil or who dislike their homes and businesses being spoiled by hydrocarbons see this as their opportunity to strike while the iron is hot.  The environmental community is particularly charged up by this event and see this immediate post-spill period as a key time to make progress against increased drilling and a carbon-intensive economy.  It is important to understand that this spill comes in the wake of the defeat of the anti-oil constituency’s anti-fracking ballot Measure P by what was widely viewed as “outside money” from the oil industry in last November’s Santa Barbara County elections.  This spill only added insult to injury in the minds of many environmental activists in Santa Barbara County and has sparked a renewed interest in getting something done.

While the inevitable political jockeying and positioning has begun, of particular note is movement by political leaders to respond to this spill.  As noted by Henry Dubroff in last week’s Pacific Coast Business Times:

Political fortunes will rise or fall based on what happens.  California Attorney General Kamela Harris is running to replace Barbara Boxer in the U.S. Senate and her investigation into the Refugio disaster could boost her cred with green voters.  Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a most ambitious politician, casts one of the three votes on the state lands commission.  In the race to replace retiring U.S. Rep. Lois Capps, a Santa Barbara Democrat and staunch environmentalist, the impact of the Refugio spill will loom very large.

To this we can add a rush by our local representatives to do something in the legislative arena as quickly as possible.  The Ventura County Star reports as on late Tuesday afternoon:

“If we do nothing, and then something happens again, then shame on us,” said Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara.

Jackson said she will submit legislation designed to beef up the state’s pipeline inspections and also to empower local fishermen to quickly respond to marine oil spills.

Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Carpinteria, will propose a bill to require all oil pipelines in offshore or near-shore areas be equipped with automatic shut-off valves, which the Plains All American Pipeline’s facility did not have.

“From what I know of the gap in time from when they knew something about the spill and when the cleanup began, I think it’s safe to say an automatic shut-off valve would have reduced the scale of the spill,” he said.

Because it is well past the deadline for introducing new bills in the Legislature this year, Jackson and Williams intend to strip the language from existing bills and amend them to include their oil spill-related proposals.

Jackson noted that it took six hours for boats from Los Angeles dispatched by the state Office of Oil Spill Prevention and Response to arrive in Santa Barbara. Had the crews of local fishing boats been trained and equipped, she said, they could have responded much more quickly to begin the cleanup.

The proposal is modeled after a program already in place in Alaska.

“Nobody knows the oceans, the currents or the winds better than fishermen. They’re anxious to help,” she said. “The earlier you can respond to a problem, the less likely it is to spread.”

Although the details have not been developed, Jackson said she envisions having state hazardous materials experts train willing fishermen to become volunteer responders.

I’m all for change and doing things better.  God knows we can improve on many, many fronts.  But I would hope we do this armed with facts and not an overly worried sense of urgency stemming from appeals to pathos.  There is much more to the story than those charismatic critters.  Amongst other things, I would hope for an improved monitoring network of ecological and social systems, cheaper and more portable/rapidly deployable response systems such as the ROV technology we are developing in my lab, etc.  Only time will tell how this all turns out.  But one things is for sure; the more oiled dolphins we see, the less of a reasoned approach we all will take.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!