SAGE

Elevator Talk

Post #1

No content can be found.

QSEN Teamwork & Collaboration Guidelines

6197907484_c0df5c5478_o

Member strengths, limitations, and values:

Jordin:

  • Strengths- Writing, PowerPoint, mind maps, posters, teamwork, communication
  • Limitations- Being on time & scheduling that works for everyone
  • Values- Hard work & teamwork

Hannah:

  • Strength: getting work finished on time, organized, open to compromise, take charge when needed, communication
  • Limitations: speaking during a presentation
  • Values: teamwork, kind, honest, truthful.

Miguel:

  • Strengths: Communication, listening, works well with others, use of technology (ppt), creative
  • Limitations: Finding time, presenting (to an extent), writing (to an extent)
  • Values: Team player, honesty, creativity, hard worker

Team member roles and accountabilities:

Group accountabilities will be equally dispersed among the group members. Each member will be expected to participate and complete assigned tasks on time to avoid further disciplinary action. All ideas, thoughts, and/or suggestions will be heard and majority ruling will take place on all decision making.

Communication style:

Various methods of communication will be utilized throughout the course of this project, including: google docs, text messaging, emails, designated meeting times, and phone calling.

Leadership style:

A demographic leadership style will be utilized in order to incorporate all members within the decision making process.

Strategies for successful team functioning:

  • Listening to others ideas
  • Effective communication
  • Shared workload
  • Shared responsibilities
  • Staying on topic
  • Fulfill tasks and assignments
  • Respect
  • Flexibility

Day 2: The Presentation of Self

I am an introvert. I prefer to spend time by myself, with my family, or with a few close friends. When I was younger my introversion was interpreted by others as shyness. I internalized that narrative. I avoided speaking to groups, and discussing the picayune details of my life. Those things made me uncomfortable.

Much of what I do as a college professor I do by myself, or with a close colleague. Being a professor allows me to indulge my introversion. Except when it does not. Much of what I do involves interaction with others. Teaching classes, presenting papers, contributing in meetings, describing my research–they are all parts of the job. They all require me to be someone other than my introverted self.

On a daily basis–in front of a class, in meeting, at a conference–I find myself in uncomfortable situations, situations that challenge my tendency toward introversion. If your first exposure to me was in a classroom you would swear that I was an extrovert, a comedian.

I am a performer. I am an actor.

According to sociologist Erving Goffman, we are all actors. In presenting ourselves to others we adopt verbal and nonverbal means of communication that shape how others understand us. Goffman calls this the “presentation of self.”  He uses the metaphor of theater to understand how the actor and the audience interact to create understanding.

Presentation of self depends on the individual and the audience. My presentation in a classroom involves a combination of humor, informality, curiosity, and professional rigor. In a meeting, a mixture of authority, humor, and purposeful ignorance. The common thread in my presentation of self is humor, which I consider indispensable for a variety of purposes, especially relieving class or group tensions. I am reasonably funny. It works for me. Especially to the degree that my authority is already established.

This week the Interdisciplinary Learning Community focused on the presentation of self. Lindsey O’Connor (Sociology) discussed nonverbal behaviors and how they influence others’ impressions of us. Her main focus was Deborah Gruenfeld’s distinction between high and low status behaviors.

 

Behaviors associated with “playing high” include being open, and relaxed; keeping one’s  head still, speaking in complete sentences, and holding eye contact. “Playing low” includes behaviors like keeping one’s body close and tight, minimizing one’s footprint, shrink, incomplete sentences, fleeting and jerky movements, glancing and looking away, smiling, trying to make others feel better. All of these behaviors indicate that you know and understand your position.

Effectively presenting oneself involves a combination of playing high and playing low. Playing high promotes confidence in one’s self and thus in others. Playing low improves others’ sense that one is approachable. To help students better understand these two sets of behaviors they were asked to do two 30-second “elevator talks” –one adopting behaviors associated with playing high, and one demonstrating behaviors of playing low.

There is no perfect recipe for presenting oneself. At least I do not think there is. One has to understand one’s self and one’s audience. What is comfortable and may work for me may not work for another person. And my presentation of self does not work for every audience. Some will find my humor or informality (e.g., my willingness to employ profanity, wearing jeans and t-shirts to work) off-putting, or unprofessional. Yet, simultaneously, my willingness to use humor and occasional profanity may paradoxically communicate a higher sense of status.

Each of us has to find a level of comfort with our presentational style. We need to adapt to changes in our audience. We need to become shrewd students of our own behavior, how our behavior affects others, and how others’ use their behaviors to influence our impressions of them.

 

 

GREAT Minds in STEM

GREAT Minds in STEM
Deadline: April 30, 2015

High School, undergraduate, and graduate students

link: GREAT Minds in STEM

UnCoRe: Undergraduate Computer Research (UNCoRe) in Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace at Oakland University

UnCoRe – Undergraduate Computer Research in Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace
Deadline: 03/18/2015

The Computer Science and Engineering Department at Oakland University invites students to apply to its eleventh summer of an NSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduate students. The students selected to participate will be immersed in a research environment under the mentoring of CSE faculty.
This program is a full-time comprehensive educational experience targeted to women and minorities in particular. It should be understood by the students that this position is not merely a summer job, but rather an educational experience where the students are treated as junior colleagues.
Requirements:
Open to all non-graduating undergraduate students (US citizens and permanent residents) with an interest in Computer Science and Engineering.
Students cannot be working or taking classes at the same time.
Students will be selected based on statement of interest, letters of recommendation and a phone interview.

UnCoRe
Computing Alliance of Hispanic-Serving Institutions (CAHSI)

TechnoVascular Health

Heart Technology

 

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the number one cause of morbidity and mortality around the world (World Health Organization [WHO], 2015). It has been reported that over 17.5 million people died as result of CVD in 2012, which accounts to almost 1/3 (31%) of all deaths within that year (WHO, 2015). As a result, more emphasis has been placed on preventive strategies and health promotion. Thus screening for CVD risk has been recognized as a prime method for preventing morbidity and mortality (Surka et al., 2014). With the advancement of technology and its increasing use in health care, benefits have shown promise in preventing CVD (Surka et al., 2014). The article by Surka et al. (2014) discusses the use of a mobile CVD risk application tool and its benefits as a screening tool versus the paper-based screening assessment.

The basis of this study involved the creation of a CVD risk assessment application based on a paper-based screening tool (Surka et al., 2014). The paper-based screening tool assessed for six risk factors, which included age, sex, diabetes, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index (Surka et al., 2014). Twenty-four community health workers were chosen and trained to use the mobile application using mobile devices (smartphones) and 537 people were screened (Surka et al., 2014). Results indicated that training time for the mobile application-screening tool (3 hours) was about four times less than the paper-based screening training (12.3 hours) (Surka et al., 2014). The mean screening time for the mobile application (21 minutes) was about 1/3 less than the paper-based screening assessment (35.4 minutes) (Surka et al., 2014). Common themes that rose from this study indicated that the mobile application was easier to use, took less time to screen individuals, and resulted in fewer errors (Surka et al., 2014). Nonetheless, these results indicated that the mobile application was favored over the paper-based screening tool due to its ease of use, time efficiency, and avoidance of errors.

The growth of technology and increasing use in health care shows promise for future health considerations. I am excited for what the future holds and am willing to learn more about how technology can be used as an adjunct for patient care. Have a great weekend everyone!

References

Surka, S., Edirippulige, S., Steyn, K., Gaziano, T., Puoane, T., & Levitt, N. (2014). Evaluating      the use of mobile phone technology to enhance cardiovascular disease screening by community health workers. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(9), 648-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.008

World Health Organization. (2015). Cardiovascular diseases. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/

 

 

Heart in a box

heart in a box

“Heart in a box” is a portable heart perfusion system. It is still being tested through clinical trials in the US but is already being used in parts of Europe and Australia (Suchetka, 2011). Instead of putting the heart to be transplanted on ice and in a cooler for transport, the heart is put in the chamber pictured above. This system pumps warm oxygenated blood while still beating and still allows for tests to be done on the heart before it is put into the recipient. Typically, the donor heart can remain on ice in a cooler for about four hours before complications can occur but with heart in a box, the heart can survive for up to twelve hours (Suchetka, 2011).

I think this is an amazing invention and may change how heart transplantation is performed in the future in America. I also took a look at the company who creates this technology, Transmedics, and it also looks like they are creating similar transplant technology for lungs and livers as well (“TransMedics,” 2015). This type of technology could possibly decrease post operative complications because the heart was monitored throughout the entire transplant process (Suchetka, 2011). Meaning, less complications for critical care nurses when taking care of post-operative heart transplant patients. I think some questions arise from this type of technology as well. Do patients who have this type of transplant live longer? Is there really a chance of less complication in the long run? I am excited to see what the results of the clinical trials being done at the eight hospitals in the US have in store for the future.

References

Suchetka, D. (2011, August 19). ‘heart in a box’ invention allows transplant hearts to remain outside the body for 12 hours. Retrieved from http://www.cleveland.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2012/08/heart_in_a_box_invention_to_ex.html

Transmedics. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.transmedics.com/wt/page/index

ICU DELIRIUM