Assignment 3

Assignment 3 Research Methods

How to Prepare for Class Tomorrow

Hi everyone. Please view this 40 second video announcement to learn how to prepare for tomorrow’s class. See you at 3pm!

Contextualizing a Primary Document

The primary document I chose was written by a veteran who served in World War II as well as the Korean War, who says he’s not too sure that he is proud to have done so. This is because of the trial of Lieutenant Calley. This is where the ambiguities started. He explained how he didn’t agree with the verdict of the trial with sentencing Lieutenant William Calley to life in prison. This took place because of the My Lai murder’s in Vietnam during the Vietnam War in which Lieutenant Calley was involved in. As a result, he asked Congressman Bizz Johnson to represent the people and support the disengagement act of 1971.
Lieutenant Calley was tried and convicted of premeditated murder of twenty-two Vietnamese civilians in the My Lai Massacre in 1968. According to the Toronto Star article by anonymous, during the My Lai Massacre, frustrated U.S. troops came to My Lai on a ‘search and destroy’ mission, looking for elusive Viet Cong guerrillas. Although there were no reports of enemy fire, the U.S. troops began mowing down villagers and setting fire to their homes. The incident shocked Americans and undermined support for the war (I am Very Sorry,’ Ex-U.S. Officer Says of My Lai Massacre; Slaying of Women and Children in 1968 was Turning Point in Vietnam War).
The U.S. veteran explains in the document that the responsibility for the actions at My Lai rests much higher than Lieutenant Calley. If he is guilty, then so is everyone else. If he is sentenced to life imprisonment or death, then so does every lawmaker and citizen who tolerates acts of war. He feels that Bizz Johnson, a representative of the people, should correct this miscarriage of justice. He feels that public opinion carries no little or no weight, and this is why men like Lieutenant Calley are deprived of their rights as a citizen.
In comparison, the secondary document, “From Testimony to Tragedy: My Lai in personal perspective,” shows a different viewpoint. U.S. Private Dennis Conti personally witnessed the events that took place in Vietnam. He testified and said that while he and riflemen Paul Meadlo were guarding a group of prisoners, most of which were women and children, Lieutenant Calley ordered the two soldiers to “take care of them.” The soldiers replied and said “we are,” and Lieutenant Calley responded with, “no, kill them all.” Private Conti refused to do so while Meadlo executed the order and began to shoot the civilians and since Conti refused, Calley killed the rest of the children. When it was said and done, Lieutenant Calley turned his back and walked away (From Testimony to Tragedy: My Lai in personal perspective). It seems that these innocent woman and children were killed for pleasure, and not to defend the platoon.
In the document, the citizen also wants Congressman Bizz Johnson to support the disengagement act in 1971. Disengagement involved withdrawing from the war and bringing our troops home by December of 1970. By April 1971, hearings began and included testimonies and debates from several members of Congress, as well as from representatives of interested pro-war and anti-war organizations (Powell).
For more information you can find these journals in the JSTOR database. These sources can further help you to understand the ambiguities of the primary document giving detailed explanations of the events that occurred during the Vietnam War. These are valid and reliable sources because they are from a database with scholarly sources filled with massive amounts of information and anything you want to know.

Amnesty of Draft Evaders

Linda Letter 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

On February 18, 1972, Harold T. “Bizz” Johnson received a letter from Linda Ledford of Redding, CA about an upcoming policy proposal for amnesty of men who had avoided being drafted or deserted the war effort by escaping to Canada and other various countries. The original response Bizz had given her first letter was that he did not agree with offering the deserters/resisters any form of Amnesty, for they had a basic duty to follow the law and they broke it.

 

Linda Letter 2Ms. Ledford did not agree with Mr.Johnson’s opinion as her letter goes on to describe that any and all deserters who accepted amnesty were forced to serve a minimum of 2 years in a federal institution, when all they did was avoid killing “unknown” people. The way she uses unknown, shows a possible insight that she does not fully believe the people Americans are killing are possibly innocent, nor are they a kind of people Americans have barely heard of.

Ms. Ledford also touches on the idea that Mr.Johnson has a duty as her representative to vote in what she believes is right, whether his opinion agrees or not. As her letter quotes “We are each entitled to our opinions, but you, as my representative, vote in my place, and your opinion does not correctly represent mine”. This could say that she will not be voting for Mr. Johnson in the next upcoming election.

Linda Letter 3Ms. Ledford’s letter shows a lot of detail to research of the policy and her reading of the booklets gives insight that she is well educated, meaning she may have known in the past that presidents before have granted amnesty to others when there was a time of unsteadiness. “Although the Constitution does not use the word, there is a long tradition of presidential amnesty in America. George Washington granted amnesty to the farmers who staged the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794″(CQ almanac).

 

Originally When President Nixon was asked about offering amnesty to deserters in November 1971, he gave a strong and firm no to the idea, but when January 1972 came around and asked the question again, he stated he would consider the idea of amnesty, but not while there were still soldiers fighting in Vietnam. Coincidentally, President Nixon never had a chance to see that through as July 1974, he resigned from president of the United States. This put President Gerald Ford to the forefront of this issue, and by September 16 (Today!), 41 years ago (1974), he offered any remaining deserters conditional amnesty.

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

Amnesty: Reputation for draft evaders, deserters. (1973). CQ almanac 1972(28th ed.). Washington, DC:               Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/cqal72-1250963

Contextualizing a Primary Document

Betsi Cervantes

September 15, 2015

Pols 300

Professor Kelly

On January 13, 1970 Gilbert Zicklin, a professor of sociology at UC Davis wrote to Congressman Harold “Bizz” Johnson to express his opposition to the War only strengthened by the massacre at My Lai. It was not until November 1969 that the incident at My Lai started to garner serious media attention. This was in due in large part to a young GI named Ronald Ridenhour “ who wrote a letter to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of defense, the President and several Congressmen and Senators describing what had happened at My Lai and requesting an investigation” (Oliver 248). Consequently, charges were brought up against William Calley for the murder of 109 Vietnamese civilians. This document is important because it brought to light actions by the federal government as they tried to cover up what was really going on in Vietnam. The government would not speak on the matter due to court martial, and the general consensus would be to blame the Viet Cong or dismiss it as propaganda. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh broke the story in 1969 to dispel any of that and show the American public the senseless acts of crimes being committed accompanied by photographs that show women and children being rounded up for execution.

Professor Zicklin opinion is that U.S. involvement in Vietnam “represents a fundamental policy of economic if not direct political empire-building.” He is referring to the fact that the U.S should not have entered a war with Vietnam and in doing so was attempting to assert its position as the world’s most dominant power. This is supported by the actions of our leaders throughout the years, following a rhetoric of anti-communism reflected through policy decisions internationally. In 1962, President Kennedy signs the Foreign Assistance Act, which provides military assistance to countries around the world who are under attack and in danger of a communist regime. Additionally, U.S Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon supported the President of South Vietnam, Nguyen Van Thieu despite the authoritarian nature of his regime. The primary source is legislation of the sixties which was passed by Congress and can be viewed on the government website which helps us understand the attitudes of the time, as we were also going through the Cold War which is responsible for the anti-communist attitude of the time. The U.S was acting as a world police of sorts, riding the world of the communist evil and trying to assert power through the guise of democracy, liberty, and freedom.

Professor Zicklin also argues that the “enemy here is turning out to be Attorney General Mitchell (his wife) and President Nixon.” President Nixon and his administration were not aggressively advancing with negotiations with Paris. The U.S has a responsibility to assert diplomatic initiative and pressure that way we can limit our involvement in Southeast Asia. Zicklin is alluding to the attempted sabotage along with Attorney General Mitchell of the Paris Peace Accords in 1968 which would have ended the war much sooner. It was later revealed, through declassified tapes of phone conversation between President Lyndon B. Johnson that he had evidence Nixon sabotaged the peace talks in Paris and Nixon had committed treason and had “bold on his hands.” On one hand, Nixon feigned ignorance as to why the South Vietnamese withdrew the peace talks, while on the other he was the one who had orchestrated it. While at the time this letter was written, the writer was unaware that these tapes would be released many years later by the Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library and the BBC. The tapes provides us with insight into political strategies and how President Johnson handled a series of crisis that shook a nation. The policies and tactics that Richard Nixon used throughout the war and his administration further tarnished his legacy and is notorious for the conspiracy known as Watergate which led to his later resignation from office.

Additionally, Mr. Zicklin refers to Nixon’s policy of Vietnamization as a means to “pacify the American people,” using Wall Street strategies to sell a “quasi-lie.” Senator Edmund Muskie criticized President Nixon for releasing a private letter from Ho Chi Minh while keeping a secret a timetable for withdrawing U.S troops from Vietnam. He argues that Nixon left the door wide open for peace talks, while Nixon says in a speech to the American people that Ho’s letter, “flatly rejected my initiative.” Senate leaders urged Nixon to seek a mutual cease fire as well as their continued support to negotiation efforts. The continued media attention on Nixon and the Vietnam War was on every America’s mind as well in every major media outlet across the country. Senator Muskie was a politician, openly challenging President Nixon’s questionable actions, further piling on the pressure for Nixon to end the Vietnam War and reflect the will of the American people.

As a sociology professor, Professor Zicklin, wrote this letter attempting to appeal to Congressman Johnson’s reason and facts. He is speaking for himself as his frustrations mount with what the government and President Nixon deems for the best interest of the people. Not only is he appalled by what is going on, he pleads for the restoration of South Vietnam and for the government to tell the truth for the sake of democracy. Also, he refers to those in power as the real enemy, infringing upon our liberties and until our legislators realize the urgency of the situation. A final plea to fulfill the obligation that democracy has of peace, justice, and liberty for all are the values that our forefathers fought for and we are still fighting for today.

 

Primary Doc 1

Part 2

About

Hello, I’m Aemoni Harris and this is a showcase the process of my academic writing.

Clifton Justice – http://cliftonjustice.cikeys.com/english-107/

The Why of Cognition: Emotion and the Writing Process

Brief Summary

Brand discusses how emotions, as a subject of study, have been ignored in the field of psychology in writing. So far, writing has been considered an act of logic rather than emotion, but Brand disagrees with this notion. She feels that emotions are a key component of the writing experience and explains her reasoning behind her belief. She also critiques the work of Flower and Hayes and their lack of acknowledgement towards emotion’s involvement in writing.

 

 

Emotion, Memory, Motivation, Values

  • Our minds break down concepts until we are left with a single utterance that is closest to “pure meaning” or sense (437).
  • Sense- all psychological events associated with a single word.
  • Goes against Flower & Hayes because they have yet to pinpoint how Long Term Memory and Language interact.
  • Emotion is not fully explored in theory
    • Flower & Hayes skirt around the issue of emotion and motivation
  • Morality: Age has been linked to the degree of one’s reasoning
  • Critical thinking-morals-beliefs-attitude-preferences-good v. bad-emotion.
    • Critical thinking is affected by emotion

 

Limitations of Cognitive Models of Writing

  • Flower & Hayes helped solidify the psychology of writing
  • Critique:
  • Limitations of protocols
  • Editing of experiment’s results
  • No terminology for emotions
  • Accused of using Jargon
  • Monitor is too ambiguous
  • ***Only good writers follow the model

 

Potential Studies into the Emotions

  • Students should be aware of the impact of emotions
  • How emotions affect writing
  • Different emotions/personalities result in different writing
  • Need to understand the relationship between cognition and emotion

 

Connection to Article

  • I can honestly say that I agree with Brand’s reasoning. There has never been a time where my writing hasn’t been interrupted by frustration or sped along because of my positive mood. The pure euphoria that I feel when I’ve completed an extremely difficult piece of work is a clear indicator that Brand is onto something. Flower and Hayes’ model needs to be adapted to incorporate emotions, otherwise it should be scrapped entirely.

 

Discussion Questions

  1. Do you agree with Brand’s critique of Flower and Hayes’ research? Why or why not? Do you think the Flower and Hayes cognitive model is practical?
  2. How often do you think emotions play a role in your own writing? Can you think of a specific example?

 

 

Citations:

Beaman, Marian. “Extreme-emotions.” Photograph. Plainandfancygirl. 11 Jan. 2014. Web. 14 Sept. 2015.

Brand, Alice G. “The Why of Cognition: Emotion and the Writing Process.” College Composition and Communication” 38. No. 4 (1987): 436-443. Web. 14 Sept. 2015.

Flower, and Hayes. “Cognitive Process Model.” Photograph. Wikipedia. 5 Apr. 2011. Web. 14 Sept. 2015.

 

Project One

 

Challenges Faced by Literacy

Deborah Brandt defines sponsorship as” Figures who appear in people’s memories of literacy who can be older relatives, teachers, or anyone who serves as a powerful leader that initiates the process of reading and writing (167). This can be interpreted in many different ways whether it be in a positive or negative connotation. When first reading through the article “Sponsors of Literacy”, I was convinced that a sponsor was someone I looked up to that taught me how to read. I concluded that a sponsor was similar to a mentor that teaches one how to be literate. However when analyzing the stories told within the article, I determined that even though a sponsor is present, that doesn’t necessarily mean it leads to the path of literacy. A sponsor serves as both the angel and devil sitting on one’s shoulder. A sponsor dictates whether one has the motivation to learn how to read and write, but also paves the path which is the struggle for one to become literate. I believe that literacy is mostly self-taught, but it is the one’s we look up to and the resources given that begin the process of literacy.

Without reading and writing, life is very limited. According to Katherine Hansen from quintcareers.com, says” More than 58 percent of jobs include hours of reading and writing” (Hansen, 1). In today’s society it is critical to have the ability to read and write, because if you want a job to make money, literacy is a requirement. Reading and writing go hand in hand but it all starts with determining who and what your sponsor is. Going back to when I was child, reading and writing was a constant struggle because I did not know how to do either. It shaped who I am today and determined what kind of work ethic I have as a person.

In my personal experience, I used technology specifically television to teach me how to read and write when I was a child. Being that my parents were always working, I was alone with my Grandma who mostly all the time so I had no idea how to read or write. I was struggling with Pre-school because I could barely understand the teachers and I couldn’t play with any kids because of the language barrier, due to the fact that I was speaking a different language at home. This led me to watch television constantly as much as I could. I was accidentally playing with the remote and I hit the captions button and words appeared on the screen. By watching many movies and programs, I was starting to learn English. I soon started to write down what I was looking at even though I didn’t know the meaning. I then asked questions to my parents about what the words I wrote down meant, and began learning how to read.

Even though my sponsor were my parents who constantly told me that without reading or writing I would never be successful, no one took the time out of their day to teach me what I needed to know. I had the support and resources to learn how to read and write, but no mentor to sit down with me and really teach me. Due to my personal experience with reading specifically, I disagree with Brandt because I was privileged as a child, but it took me many years to master reading and writing. In fact, I was significantly behind than those whose were economically poor, to a point where I almost got held back. I was a child with no one taking the time to teach me what I needed to know which put me in a situation where teachers had to speak with me separately because I could not grasp any content, especially when it came to the topic of reading.

 

Reading is the action or skill of reading written or printed matter silently or aloud. When thinking about one’s daily routine, reading is involved in about every single task one completes throughout the day. For example, reading signs, logos, watching television ads, looking for songs on an IPod, restaurants, reading labels, and buying certain products for one’s personal use all involves reading. Imagine living a life where one couldn’t read and being unable to buy what brand they want because he or she cannot read. Imagine not being able to use a key board, because you don’t know what letters mean what and you don’t know what letters make up what words.

Reading depicts what jobs one can get because of the inability to read. A prime example of this is looking at the movie “Holes”. Zero’s character was in the juvenile detention camp where he didn’t have the ability to read. Due to him being illiterate, he ended up getting arrested because without reading, one is limited to what they can do with their lives. However “Caveman” played by Shia Labeouf, taught Zero how to read where they both ended up leaving the juvenile detention and turned their life around. In this case, “Caveman” was Zero’s sponsor because he was the one who influenced him how to read and began the interest in Zero wanting to learn how to read and write. As Brandt states, “Social economic status effects how one becomes literate” (169-170). Zero’s experience was much like Malcolm X, where they both went to jail before learning how to be literate.

A sponsor I believe serves a double-ended sword, where it can progress one’s ability to read and write, but also slows them down. Malcolm X was not literate prior to going to prison, but although one could argue that prison was his sponsor, it still is jail where criminals are convicted of crimes. Nobody wants their freedom to be taken away, yet that is what happened to Malcolm to become literate. It took being locked up with nothing better to do to learn how to read and write. His method of learning how to read and write was discussed in     “Learning to Read” where he said, “I sat down and would copy every word in the dictionary until I learned what they all meant” (2). There are many different methods of learning how to read and write and in this case, it was prison the worst place to be to educate him.

When waking up in the morning, many people will immediately check their social media no matter what site they are on. They will scroll through Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and whatever else there may be. A simple task like checking social media or sending a text message all have one thing in common, reading and writing. Writing is the skill of putting coherent words on paper and creating text. Text messaging has increasingly been the number one use for a cell phone. In fact according to Pewinternet.org,” 90 percent of Americans own a cell phone, where 67 percent of those people are constantly sending text messages” (Smith, 7). Referring to the article” All Writing is Autobiography” Murray demonstrates, “I would write constantly about my personal experiences to further advance my reading and writing skills” (73).

Aside from reading, writing was an immense struggle for me. I would avoid writing in school because I wrote very poorly where nothing was coherent, it was just random words that I had no idea their meaning on paper. This was a struggle that carried all throughout my high school career. Even writing a five paragraph essay was very difficult, until I started writing for fun. Like Murray, when I was in high school I started writing about the events that I experienced throughout each day. I would step by step write about how I was feeling about a certain situation, followed by a prediction of what the next day might be like. The first journal entry was not grammatically correct and never made any sense. As time went on, I bought a book that was called “English for Dummies”. The more research I conducted about writing, the better I was becoming. Being that English was never my favorite class, I never bothered to learn about it. This took me back to what my parents said about literacy, and I wanted to change the way I was reading and writing. I dreaded reading but started to find a passion for it when my writing started to change.

Referring back to what said about reading and writing going hand in hand, the more I was reading, the better my writing was becoming. In the article, “The Joy of Reading and Writing” Alexie Sherman said,” Superman comics is what had me interested in reading and it was a way I learned how to read” (11). Since television served as a teacher for me, I had to build upon that which wasn’t much to work with. That is why I started reading books about writing and started writing about my personal experiences. Much like Murray, my entire life was being documented where certain events became my main topic of writing. I was acquiring knowledge of my personal life and conducting it into my write.

Heading into college, I made it an assignment to go back and edit all my journal entries I wrote in high school. At this point I was an efficient writer because of all the papers I needed to write were constant practice. I was now in love with writing and couldn’t go a day without either reading or writing. My knowledge of vocabulary grew and I was writing ten page papers easily without any difficulties. I realized that the older I was becoming, I understood why my parents told me what she did. If they didn’t discuss how important literacy is, I wouldn’t have the motivation to learn. Even though they said many statements about literacy, I still don’t understand why neither took the time to teach me when they taught my sister. They made me struggle throughout elementary school and always was behind because they never taught me. Sparking an interest and teaching are two complete opposite tasks. However, because I had resources to self-teach, which was very difficult at the time and still is a struggle today. My literacy skills were built upon television as Alexie’s was built on Superman comics. I believe that it is the little things in life that spark a personal interest, which drives one to become better in a certain area. That area for me was reading and writing. Something that I hated and was never proficient at, became something I couldn’t live without.

Based on my personal experiences of what I went through is the reason why I am torn between Brandt’s ideas of sponsorship. I do agree that my sponsor started the first step into becoming literate, but although I had the tools like Murray and was privileged, it slowed me down and created an uphill road to conquering literacy. As prison was a sponsor for Malcolm X, it created a battle for him but became a sponsor to someone else.  Of course I learn something new every day but if one doesn’t have a sponsor, I consider that one becomes a sponsor to someone else.  Not having a sponsor or the resources to become literate, is where I disagree with Brandt.

I understand that she doesn’t argue that if one doesn’t have a sponsor they will never be literate, she suggests that it will take the longer to learn and will have more obstacles to face. Knowing that sponsorship isn’t as ideal as one may think, it is self-motivation that creates one to be literate. In my own life, writing will always be something that is continuously being learned and always needs to be improved, but that is because I want to keep working on it. I had sponsors who supported me but didn’t give me the time needed to learn. Throughout my life and growing up it was clear that literacy was not only important to communicate with the world, but it was competition that pushed me to achieving higher education.

Literacy is constantly becoming more difficult and now one cannot get a job without having a Master’s degree at least. With competition growing, education and literacy are critical to living a decent life. As for me, literacy has and always be a top priority because of how important it is. Due to the fact that one needs a minimum of a Bachelor’s degree to hold any job in today’s society, it is now proven that literacy is more important than ever. Being that both my Mom and Dad always told me how important literacy was, I knew that I was going to get my Master’s when starting college. Some may argue that literacy is not needed to find certain jobs.

For example, Floyd Mayweather is a multimillionaire boxer who does not have the ability to read or write. Instead, his job is to use physical force where reading and writing is not needed. Lowery from Deborah’s article was another example of finding a job having no literacy, being that he was in the military. Instead the military needed him for combat. However in both situations, literacy is needed. Mayweather cannot even read the name of his competitors or the brand of what he is wearing. When it says “Round 3”, all he can see is the number 3. Deborah Brandt, who consistently comments that socioeconomic class and lack of sponsorship effects literacy, is proven by Mayweather’s background. His entire family were professional boxers, where his mom and aunt died of drug use. He had a lack of resources, and followed into his dad’s footsteps of being a boxer, because nobody taught him or led him into the interest of literacy.

On the other end of the spectrum for Lowery, today’s military has advanced where one needs to of course learn how to read a map. Imagine being in the military and not being able to know your location or read the name tags of your fellow soldiers. He saw that his father liked reading the newspaper and was into politics that sparked the interest of literacy. He did have an advantage growing up middle-class and being Caucasian, yet he too struggled with literacy because of his sponsor who never placed an importance or took the time to teach him how to read and write. This is why I place an importance to literacy. Being that I am now about to graduate college, that they were correct.

As I come to an end, hearing others’ experiences with the road of literacy was something I never thought about. As I mentioned literacy is not something we are born with, yet in today’s society we use reading and writing in our everyday life, that we forget who and what taught us to become literate in the first place. Having a sponsor is the first step when becoming literate because as a child, but soon realize it is those exact people who make it that much harder to learn how to read and write.

As we get older, we now understand the challenges many had when learning reading and writing. I believe that literacy is not just about those two aspects, but about what we did to have to the ability to read and write. I had a sponsor but it was because of them I struggled with reading and writing. I cannot say that I am unhappy with how things turned out because I taught myself how to read and write, and if I didn’t struggle, I would still be the same little girl who was illiterate and behind in class. Literacy should be important to everyone but not all can learn right away because of their sponsors. Reading and writing can be problematic, which is why we must continue to educate ourselves and others so that they do not have the same challenges in order to be successful.

 

 

 

References

Alexie, Sherman. “The Joy of Reading and Writing: Superman and Me.” The Most Wonderful

Books: Writers on Discovering the Pleasures of Reading. Eds. Michael Dorris and Emilie Buchwald. Minneapolis: Milkweed, 1997.  Web. 13 Sept. 2015.

 

Brandt, Deborah. “Sponsors of Literacy.” College Composition and Communication. 49.2

(1998): 165-185. Jstor. Web. 13 Sept. 2015.

 

Hansen, Katherine. “Writing Skills: More Important Than Ever on the Job. “Writing Skills: More       

Important Than Ever on the Job. Live Career, 20 June 2015. Web. 10 Sept. 2015.

 

Malcolm X. Learning to Read.” The Autobiography of Malcolm X. New York: Random House,

  1. Web. 12 Sept. 2015.

 

Murray, Donald M. “All Writing Is Autobiography.” College Composition and Communication.

42.1 (1991): 66-74. Jstor. Web. 14 Sept. 2015.

 

Smith, Aaron. “U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015.” Pew Research Center Internet Science Tech RSS.

Pew Research Center, 01 Apr. 2015. Web. 11 Sept. 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Understanding the Letter

Understanding the Message

Melissa and Jessica’s A-fib patient

Once upon a time there was an active 22 year old, African American male named Devone who loved playing basketball. His grandpa recently passed away from a pulmonary embolism.   He came into the ER today because he had a syncopal episode during the last quarter of the division finals for his basketball team. The nurse assessed the patient finding an irregular, thready pulse; he is pale and more fatigued than usual after a game, which has been worsening over the last week; his capillary refill is 3-4 second. His 12 lead EKG revealed atrial fibrillation with a heart rate of 140-157 bpm with no p waves.  The nurse began to assist the patient by attempting to stimulate the vagal response by having him blow through a straw which was successful in reducing heart rate to 80 bpm. The nurse also conferred with the physician to determine recommendation of anticoagulation therapy. The nurse also educated the patient on lifestyle modifications and the necessity of follow up appointment. As a result of these actions the patient was discharged with a follow-up appointment with primary physician, and prescription for 325mg of aspirin daily.