Posts

AVC Women’s Soccer as a Discourse Community

Discourse communities usually have six criteria in which need to be met according to John Swales in “The Concept of Discourse Community,” in which make up the whole of that discourse community. In whole, discourse communities need a goal, communication between the group, written communication, a genre, a vocabulary that fits the discourse, and expertise within the community. These are defined pretty stringently and are not too terribly difficult to be met if it is actually a discourse community with all of the above elements not so loosely met.

A common public goal as Swale puts it, are usually written or are sometimes implicit. In college sports such as Antelope Valley women’s Soccer the common goal is to compete against other colleges within the same division in a collegiate soccer match. The goal is to collaborate, practice, and increase athleticism in order to sufficiently out-compete other colleges. This definition would fit that “A discourse community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals,” (1). Typically college sports universally look to advance in fitness and learn to collaborate as a team and hopefully win matches with a lot of practice and discipline.

The intercommunication that exists within this discourse community in which are written are text messages, E-mails, Facebook, Flyers, Media Guides, and Twitter. In this way information about team meetings, schedules, and other important communication can be dispersed and replied to depending on which type of media it is. Text messaging usually disseminates the scheduling, as well as flyer, and E-mail. While the media guide gives a general depiction of team members and the data after the season is over. Twitter and Facebook serve more as a general media to communicate by which still content-dense but is a little more socially fit.

Participation and inter-communication from one another is another crucial piece involved. “A discourse community uses its participatory mechanisms primarily to provide information and feedback,” (1). As Swales defines, the engagement and intercommunication are part of the major functions of it.

Particularly in women’s soccer for Antelope Valley College, the mechanisms in which to do this are from attending practice, weight training, and lecture. Most of the common goal is directed towards increasing ones fitness however other important aspects are a common goal as well such as team work and commitment. Being on a collegiate sports team increases collaboration, dedication, and high work ethic.

One learns that it truly takes the entire unit to collaborate and dedicate with a high intrinsic motivation to evolve a team. The level of involvement often stems from the coach in which information is drawn out “plays” before a team and during practice; in which the entire unit begins to learn subconsciously organized and as a team in order to execute the entire function. One cannot stress the importance, of connectedness and collaboration it takes to create a winning entity.

The genre “These may involve appropriateness of topics, the form, function and positioning of discourse elements, and the roles texts play in the operation of the discourse community,” (1). The genre is narrowed down further and further beginning with a college, then the type of college, then the sport or club within the college, and then what the type of sport is. The genre in a sense is a narrowed down category of what the discourse community is. In this case it is pretty straight forward as to what the genre is as opposed to some other types of discourse communities.

The identified lexis is in this case Kinesiology based, mostly communicated by the soccer coach but also inter-exchanged between team members. The coach is the expert in which teaches the main functions whether by quotes, through experts in the field, basic terminologies, or other relative and or creative feats that communicate the goal for the team. “Repetition leads to retention,” was a quote I oftentimes heard back in 2008 for AVC Women’s soccer. But other important terms were emphasized such as learning the different anatomy, training techniques, specific play strategies, and even learning geographically where other locations existed because games are traveled at other colleges.

A lot of discipline and technique were non-verbal and physical as well but one can identify these with the lexis. A funny term used for torture (not literally) was the term “Burpie” because it always implied that the team would be implementing even more exertion on top of aerobic training, core training, and then those on top of it. One of the interesting parts of being a part of women’s soccer was learning how the statistics are calculated which is the goals, assists, and goals assist average. One can look at the NCAA website to see how these are organized and calculated.

The expertise within the community is usually based in a background in soccer in which experience is based on past experience with a club team or experience playing in High School. It is not impossible to get in without the background but it is definitely very difficult without it. Another words, usually participants with experience are included in this type of discourse community. However there are other ways to get involved without actually playing the sport such as applying to be an assistant or other type of role which usually also require their own separate type of expertise. But not always, there are even team members that participate that are whole-heartedly dedicated that never get to play although they are few.

 

Sources

  1. Swales, John. “The Concept of Discourse Community.” Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. https://csuci.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-1078759-dt-content-rid-2035541_1/courses/2158_ENGL_107_01_1410/Swales%20Discourse%20Community.pdf

Reagan: A Story Half-Told

When one enters the Reagan Library, there isn’t much thought put into how biased the conveyance of Reagan is; naturally, knowledge in a museum is presumed to be objective and telling. Though there is some truth in what is presented by the curators of the Reagan Library, the narrative of Reagan is incredibly biased, and this can be seen past the innocuous air presented by the museum which subliminally implants the notion that Reagan has done no wrong.

image_2Upon entering the exhibits of the museum, after having viewed a video noting on Reagan’s accomplishments, participants are graced with a room that emphasizes Reagan’s humanity. Most items are akin to this letter to his wife, Nancy. The purpose, it seems, it to set the foundation for the journey attendants are about to undergo; Reagan is introduced as a normal man who is sweet, kind, and is incapable of malicious intent. It is intoxicating, really, how relatable Reagan appears in this setting. He has passions, goals, and ambition as any one does, and these are stressed in the first part of the museum. Stories of love, acting, and horseback riding disarm anyone who may have ill notions of Reagan upon entering the museum.

image_1After meeting Reagan, attendees are then informed of his presidency, and this is all a bit implicit. Only facts supportive to Reagan are described in detail, such as his landslide victories in taking the electoral college (on both accounts), and an emphasis is placed on how Reagan is essentially the savior of the American Dream and capitalism through Reaganomics. The museum does this mainly with relations to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fight against communism. Realistically speaking, however, the fall is contributed to a multitude of factors, and was not solely due to Reagan’s contribution. It was moreover being president at the right time. This quotation from Reagan’s diary is used to exemplify how humble Reagan is. After painting this superhero image of Reagan, viewers are reminded of his humanity, suggesting that even though he is this great human being, he possesses no hubris.

image_4I noted this picture of Reagan casually putting away in the oval office. The museum’s atmosphere is littered with this humanization of Reagan; even in his workplace he is portrayed as this fun, relatable guy. By the time someone is through the museum they truly feel like they understand Reagan, and that he is a friend. Honestly, I was catching myself having the thoughts, “Did Reagan really do anything wrong?” The museum betrays its audience with controlled facts. They’re not displaying any lies, but there also a great lack of truth to Reagan’s presidency in the museum.

image_3One of the two sections of the museum that don’t directly discuss Reagan are those that discuss his wife and one that directly discusses communism. Hitherto this point of Reagan’s story, the museum has been well lit, warm, and it’s as though one has been walking through the halls of one of the greatest men to have ever lived. To say there was some juxtaposition to the section discussing communism is a bit of an understatement. The lighting of the room and the image here are dramatically different to the rest of the museum. The room on communism is dimly lit, cold, and violent. Needless to say, with the quotations and images expressing totalitarianism and oppression make The United States, and more specifically Reagan’s presidency, look like a paradise.

After being thrown back into the more comfortable atmosphere and being taught a bit more of Reagan’s greatness and reliability, patrons are left with this.

image_5

There are no captions. No employees to tell you how much Reagan loves jellybeans or how he saved the pride of the American people. Just a segment of the Berlin Wall. I feel this is done in part to let you, the citizen, reflect on the whole of Reagan’s story. Now, keeping in mind that the past hour or so was spent embedding the notion that Reagan is the sole proprietor of the resurgence of American Dream, one would likely remark the exhibit as a homage to Reagan’s success, further solidifying the image of Reagan the museum is trying to convey. Effective, I would say.

When viewing political information I always have a sense of ambiguity; I never am sure of how biased the source is and don’t know if the information I just ingested is true. Leaving the museum this feeling was never more prevalent. Coming into the Reagan Library I thought him as a decent man, but when knowingly being subjected to an environment designed to make him likable, I then like him less. Simply the nature of that underhandedness is enough; the details are not very determinant with that intention behind them.

I’m then left to question every sentiment I encounter. in this case, it was not Reagan so much, but more the entity of his presidency. It was the curators who decided what to make visible to the public, and I do not find Reagan’s personality notably questionable. To reiterate, the truth was being conveyed, just not the whole truth. In some cases maybe not even a fifth of the truth. For what it’s worth, Reagan was a man who had passions and goals; who loved genuinely and was a real, and the museum conveyed that.

I do not believe that the museum had an accurate portrayal of Reagan’s presidency, however. To understand that the museum can only offer so much, and even then it’s a process of dissecting every part of the process and picking out the facts. To truly grasp what Reagan’s presidency was research must be done. An easily overlooked blemish of Reagan would be the Iran-Contra Affair, in which Reagan’s fear of communism lead him to illegally sell weapons to totalitarian insurgents. Quite a thing to disregard when giving an in-depth understanding of political affairs. Keeping an open mind is key, and it is important to not misconstrue romanticized accounts and facts; but, finding the facts in those tales is integral to true understanding.

October 12th

There where many points in these articles in which I related day to day experiences society has with the news and media in general. In the article Poverty’s Poor Show in the Media there where three particular statements that jumped out at me. For one when the article spoke about” journalist interviewing people who are like us” concluding they are generally middle class and white. This article also spoke about how it’s boring to report about poor people and the news stations don’t pressure reporters to cover such topics. People get bored easily and don’t like to hear about negative things going on around them, which is why reports and understanding of poor people is a difficult task. People need be able to understand and look at both the good and the bad around the world to be able to understand it. An informed citizen can make all the difference down the road. The other article that really stood out to me was the Four Problems With the Way the Media Depicts People specifically the quote “accurate and diverse media representation is essential.” Hearing something doesn’t always make it accurate most stories people even tell their friends are skewed in some way to make it sound more dramatic than it actually was. This article also talked about how it is not only boring to report about poor people but when they do it usually involves just facts and numbers instead of an interview that isn’t just handed to them.  How something is represented makes all the difference whether or not somebody will pay any attention to it. People also generally show a blind eye to issues if it doesn’t directly effect them.

Protected: Do you know your own medications?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Protected: Keeping Track of Medications

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Week 7 Readings

Happy Saturday!

Back to reading Sterheimer this week. I think the Sternheimer chapter for this week ties in really well with our discussion(s) last week about poverty. She talks about how the media is seen as problematic and is a distraction from reality. This also connected well with the Kuper, Ridgway, and Fremstad articles that covered poverty. I liked that the Ridgway article listed four specific problems in the way that media depicts the poor. The way media portrays poverty and those who are poor definitely seems to diminish the poor’s worth as human beings. I wish there was some media outlet that would allow for honest illustration of poverty, especially in today’s day and age when it is a major issue in our country. I suppose that, for now, we have to settle for these biased depictions.

Later in the Sternheimer chapter, I found it interesting that the amount of time spent watching television increases with age, but we are more focused on children and teens watching too much television. I also was happy that she discussed the positive benefits of video games, such as the complicated rules that can lead to intellectual payoff for the player. I kind of disagreed with this because yes, learning a system of rules might be helpful to learning but I felt like she disregarded the aspect of violence. I understand that there is a rating system, but at what point do video games take it too far? Do you guys seen video games as a major issue or can they really be used as a tool for raising intellectual capability?

CI Events Going On This Week!

Hello Univ 349,

As I said in class yesterday, I will be posting the events on WordPress each week, instead of giving a long list of announcements in class! This way we can spend more time doing activities and having awesome discussions! The events are hyperlinked so if you click on them it will direct you to the CI website and give you more information on that particular event.

On a side note Channel Islands Student Housing and Residential Education is hosting the Tunnel of Oppression event.

The Tunnel of Oppression is a campus diversity initiative originally developed at Western Illinois University in 1994, inspired by The Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles. The creators of the Tunnel of Oppression sought to provide participants with an emotionally charged experience that would allow them to briefly experience what oppressed groups have endured/continue to endure in their lives. Through the use of photographs, facts, displays, vignettes, videos, and recordings concepts and forms of oppression are communicated to and interpreted by participants.

After “going through” the Tunnel participants (usually a small group – no more than 15 people) are able to debrief their experience with the facilitators who lead them through the Tunnel. Traditionally to close the debrief participants are asked to consider what actions they will take in their own lives to aid in deconstructing oppression.

If this is something that might interest you, they are looking for volunteers and actors to help with the event. If you are just interested in attending the event is October 28-29th registration is now open. You do not need to register but it helps so that they have enough people to work the event. It is more like an RSVP. If you are looking to get involved e-mail me and I can set you up with the right people. For more information you can visit https://tunnelofoppression.wordpress.com/about-2/

CI Events 09

Have a Wonderful weekend!

Katelynn Crook , TEA

Basic Skills, Genre, and Fiction as Dream

Unknown

Brief Summary

Gardner sets fiction apart from any other type of writing, he claims it shouldn’t be “mixed with freshman composition.” His thoughts are quite harsh when it comes to learning the basics. His main points are types of fiction writers, realistic and fabulist writers. How writers are influenced and how they produce their work, genre-crossing or elevation of popular culture.

Must master

  • grammer
  • syntax
  • punctuation
  • diction
  • sentence variety
  • paragraph structure
  • etc.

An American Rhetoric   book by W.W. Watt for composition.

…needs help frequently, it’s a fairly clear sign that he’ll never be a writer.

Gardener does bring up some good ideas that make you think:

“How should he begin fiction?”

“What should he write about, and how can he know when he’s done it well?”


 

New Genres

  • Genre-crossing
  • Elevation of popular culture

In any culture certain subjects become classical, repeated by artists after artists. -Gardner

Botticelli_Trinity
Botticelli 1491-1493
Masaccio,_trinità
Masaccio 1425-1427

cowboys

 

 Realistic Writer vs. Fabulist Writer 

Realistic Writer 

  • “write about what you know.”
  • includes dialogue
  • has setting, events, and characters that could exist outside the book
  • argues into acceptance

Fabulist Writer 

  • events, characters, and settings that are made up
  • creates a world
  • writes under influence
  • persuades to suspend your disbelief

They aren’t that different, both writers have to convince the reader that the story is happening and will move forward, They must first engage the reader, then convince them that this did or could happen.

…the willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith. – Coleridge

7cea7e73d5f09ad4e25ef1f1fbdc1fd8

The story becomes a dream for the reader. A key mistake is letting the dream be pulled away by a distraction. The writer must keep the readers attention continuously with vivid details. At times you can break from the dream and insert another thought into the readers head.

Writing Fiction 

  • you will obsess over your writing, that is okay.
  • “student writers never be prevented from working as seriously as he knows how to.”
  • start small
  • don’t think of it as exercise but something that that could be a work of art
  • make essential techniques second nature
  • needs some emotion

 

Personal Connection 

I agreed with Gardner especially after he broke down the details in pieces of writing. Fiction is my favorite genre and Gardner is right, if written correctly the story does come to life. There is a certain degree of emotion in the stories we read, and books become objects that flourish that emotion in ourselves. I have an attachment to all my books, because to me each book is a world brought to life by the author.

 

Questions

  1. What is your preferred fiction writing, realistic or fabulist? Why? What are the cons and pros?
  2. Do your favorite books strike emotion in you? Do you think the author felt the same emotion while writing it?

book-characters-coming-to-life-as-boy-reads-bmp