AVC Women’s Soccer as a Discourse Community

Discourse communities usually have six criteria in which need to be met according to John Swales in “The Concept of Discourse Community,” in which make up the whole of that discourse community. In whole, discourse communities need a goal, communication between the group, written communication, a genre, a vocabulary that fits the discourse, and expertise within the community. These are defined pretty stringently and are not too terribly difficult to be met if it is actually a discourse community with all of the above elements not so loosely met.

A common public goal as Swale puts it, are usually written or are sometimes implicit. In college sports such as Antelope Valley women’s Soccer the common goal is to compete against other colleges within the same division in a collegiate soccer match. The goal is to collaborate, practice, and increase athleticism in order to sufficiently out-compete other colleges. This definition would fit that “A discourse community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals,” (1). Typically college sports universally look to advance in fitness and learn to collaborate as a team and hopefully win matches with a lot of practice and discipline.

The intercommunication that exists within this discourse community in which are written are text messages, E-mails, Facebook, Flyers, Media Guides, and Twitter. In this way information about team meetings, schedules, and other important communication can be dispersed and replied to depending on which type of media it is. Text messaging usually disseminates the scheduling, as well as flyer, and E-mail. While the media guide gives a general depiction of team members and the data after the season is over. Twitter and Facebook serve more as a general media to communicate by which still content-dense but is a little more socially fit.

Participation and inter-communication from one another is another crucial piece involved. “A discourse community uses its participatory mechanisms primarily to provide information and feedback,” (1). As Swales defines, the engagement and intercommunication are part of the major functions of it.

Particularly in women’s soccer for Antelope Valley College, the mechanisms in which to do this are from attending practice, weight training, and lecture. Most of the common goal is directed towards increasing ones fitness however other important aspects are a common goal as well such as team work and commitment. Being on a collegiate sports team increases collaboration, dedication, and high work ethic.

One learns that it truly takes the entire unit to collaborate and dedicate with a high intrinsic motivation to evolve a team. The level of involvement often stems from the coach in which information is drawn out “plays” before a team and during practice; in which the entire unit begins to learn subconsciously organized and as a team in order to execute the entire function. One cannot stress the importance, of connectedness and collaboration it takes to create a winning entity.

The genre “These may involve appropriateness of topics, the form, function and positioning of discourse elements, and the roles texts play in the operation of the discourse community,” (1). The genre is narrowed down further and further beginning with a college, then the type of college, then the sport or club within the college, and then what the type of sport is. The genre in a sense is a narrowed down category of what the discourse community is. In this case it is pretty straight forward as to what the genre is as opposed to some other types of discourse communities.

The identified lexis is in this case Kinesiology based, mostly communicated by the soccer coach but also inter-exchanged between team members. The coach is the expert in which teaches the main functions whether by quotes, through experts in the field, basic terminologies, or other relative and or creative feats that communicate the goal for the team. “Repetition leads to retention,” was a quote I oftentimes heard back in 2008 for AVC Women’s soccer. But other important terms were emphasized such as learning the different anatomy, training techniques, specific play strategies, and even learning geographically where other locations existed because games are traveled at other colleges.

A lot of discipline and technique were non-verbal and physical as well but one can identify these with the lexis. A funny term used for torture (not literally) was the term “Burpie” because it always implied that the team would be implementing even more exertion on top of aerobic training, core training, and then those on top of it. One of the interesting parts of being a part of women’s soccer was learning how the statistics are calculated which is the goals, assists, and goals assist average. One can look at the NCAA website to see how these are organized and calculated.

The expertise within the community is usually based in a background in soccer in which experience is based on past experience with a club team or experience playing in High School. It is not impossible to get in without the background but it is definitely very difficult without it. Another words, usually participants with experience are included in this type of discourse community. However there are other ways to get involved without actually playing the sport such as applying to be an assistant or other type of role which usually also require their own separate type of expertise. But not always, there are even team members that participate that are whole-heartedly dedicated that never get to play although they are few.

 

Sources

  1. Swales, John. “The Concept of Discourse Community.” Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. https://csuci.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-1078759-dt-content-rid-2035541_1/courses/2158_ENGL_107_01_1410/Swales%20Discourse%20Community.pdf

Reagan: A Story Half-Told

When one enters the Reagan Library, there isn’t much thought put into how biased the conveyance of Reagan is; naturally, knowledge in a museum is presumed to be objective and telling. Though there is some truth in what is presented by the curators of the Reagan Library, the narrative of Reagan is incredibly biased, and this can be seen past the innocuous air presented by the museum which subliminally implants the notion that Reagan has done no wrong.

image_2Upon entering the exhibits of the museum, after having viewed a video noting on Reagan’s accomplishments, participants are graced with a room that emphasizes Reagan’s humanity. Most items are akin to this letter to his wife, Nancy. The purpose, it seems, it to set the foundation for the journey attendants are about to undergo; Reagan is introduced as a normal man who is sweet, kind, and is incapable of malicious intent. It is intoxicating, really, how relatable Reagan appears in this setting. He has passions, goals, and ambition as any one does, and these are stressed in the first part of the museum. Stories of love, acting, and horseback riding disarm anyone who may have ill notions of Reagan upon entering the museum.

image_1After meeting Reagan, attendees are then informed of his presidency, and this is all a bit implicit. Only facts supportive to Reagan are described in detail, such as his landslide victories in taking the electoral college (on both accounts), and an emphasis is placed on how Reagan is essentially the savior of the American Dream and capitalism through Reaganomics. The museum does this mainly with relations to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fight against communism. Realistically speaking, however, the fall is contributed to a multitude of factors, and was not solely due to Reagan’s contribution. It was moreover being president at the right time. This quotation from Reagan’s diary is used to exemplify how humble Reagan is. After painting this superhero image of Reagan, viewers are reminded of his humanity, suggesting that even though he is this great human being, he possesses no hubris.

image_4I noted this picture of Reagan casually putting away in the oval office. The museum’s atmosphere is littered with this humanization of Reagan; even in his workplace he is portrayed as this fun, relatable guy. By the time someone is through the museum they truly feel like they understand Reagan, and that he is a friend. Honestly, I was catching myself having the thoughts, “Did Reagan really do anything wrong?” The museum betrays its audience with controlled facts. They’re not displaying any lies, but there also a great lack of truth to Reagan’s presidency in the museum.

image_3One of the two sections of the museum that don’t directly discuss Reagan are those that discuss his wife and one that directly discusses communism. Hitherto this point of Reagan’s story, the museum has been well lit, warm, and it’s as though one has been walking through the halls of one of the greatest men to have ever lived. To say there was some juxtaposition to the section discussing communism is a bit of an understatement. The lighting of the room and the image here are dramatically different to the rest of the museum. The room on communism is dimly lit, cold, and violent. Needless to say, with the quotations and images expressing totalitarianism and oppression make The United States, and more specifically Reagan’s presidency, look like a paradise.

After being thrown back into the more comfortable atmosphere and being taught a bit more of Reagan’s greatness and reliability, patrons are left with this.

image_5

There are no captions. No employees to tell you how much Reagan loves jellybeans or how he saved the pride of the American people. Just a segment of the Berlin Wall. I feel this is done in part to let you, the citizen, reflect on the whole of Reagan’s story. Now, keeping in mind that the past hour or so was spent embedding the notion that Reagan is the sole proprietor of the resurgence of American Dream, one would likely remark the exhibit as a homage to Reagan’s success, further solidifying the image of Reagan the museum is trying to convey. Effective, I would say.

When viewing political information I always have a sense of ambiguity; I never am sure of how biased the source is and don’t know if the information I just ingested is true. Leaving the museum this feeling was never more prevalent. Coming into the Reagan Library I thought him as a decent man, but when knowingly being subjected to an environment designed to make him likable, I then like him less. Simply the nature of that underhandedness is enough; the details are not very determinant with that intention behind them.

I’m then left to question every sentiment I encounter. in this case, it was not Reagan so much, but more the entity of his presidency. It was the curators who decided what to make visible to the public, and I do not find Reagan’s personality notably questionable. To reiterate, the truth was being conveyed, just not the whole truth. In some cases maybe not even a fifth of the truth. For what it’s worth, Reagan was a man who had passions and goals; who loved genuinely and was a real, and the museum conveyed that.

I do not believe that the museum had an accurate portrayal of Reagan’s presidency, however. To understand that the museum can only offer so much, and even then it’s a process of dissecting every part of the process and picking out the facts. To truly grasp what Reagan’s presidency was research must be done. An easily overlooked blemish of Reagan would be the Iran-Contra Affair, in which Reagan’s fear of communism lead him to illegally sell weapons to totalitarian insurgents. Quite a thing to disregard when giving an in-depth understanding of political affairs. Keeping an open mind is key, and it is important to not misconstrue romanticized accounts and facts; but, finding the facts in those tales is integral to true understanding.

October 12th

There where many points in these articles in which I related day to day experiences society has with the news and media in general. In the article Poverty’s Poor Show in the Media there where three particular statements that jumped out at me. For one when the article spoke about” journalist interviewing people who are like us” concluding they are generally middle class and white. This article also spoke about how it’s boring to report about poor people and the news stations don’t pressure reporters to cover such topics. People get bored easily and don’t like to hear about negative things going on around them, which is why reports and understanding of poor people is a difficult task. People need be able to understand and look at both the good and the bad around the world to be able to understand it. An informed citizen can make all the difference down the road. The other article that really stood out to me was the Four Problems With the Way the Media Depicts People specifically the quote “accurate and diverse media representation is essential.” Hearing something doesn’t always make it accurate most stories people even tell their friends are skewed in some way to make it sound more dramatic than it actually was. This article also talked about how it is not only boring to report about poor people but when they do it usually involves just facts and numbers instead of an interview that isn’t just handed to them.  How something is represented makes all the difference whether or not somebody will pay any attention to it. People also generally show a blind eye to issues if it doesn’t directly effect them.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Protected: Do you know your own medications?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: