PROJECT 2:

https://docs.google.com/a/myci.csuci.edu/document/d/1T0TkyA7bBiGIVWPy0zxfO_e9CVGD3CVOaMjv_Z_yLQ0/edit?usp=sharing

 

http://prezi.com/ojuhs5e0weue/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy

Protected: Medications // OTC and prescribed drug regimens

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

The 10,000 Hour Rule

What does it take for someone to master something?

  • Passion
  • Ability
  • Opportunity***

Bill Joy

Bill Joy went to the University of Michigan at the age of 16. He helped rewrite UNIX software system. He is known as the Edison of the Internet. He is one of the most influential people of our time.

How did he get to that point?

  • 10,000 hours
    • University of MichiganScreen Shot 2015-10-12 at 7.02.16 AM
    • UC Berkeley
    • Worked for AT&T

The Beatles

The Beatles had numerous hits and one of the most well-known bands of all-time. They started the “British Invasion” of music in America. All band members went on to become solo artists.

How did they get to that point?

  • 10,000 hours
    • Liverpool
    • Hamburg

Bill Gates

Bill Gates was raised in Seattle, Washington. He started off in public schools then moved to private. He went to Harvard for 2 years and then dropped out to start his own software company. Co-founder of Microsoft. One of the wealthiest people of Earth.

How did they get to that point?

  • 10,000 hours
    • Lakeside
    • ISI (Information Sciences Inc.)
    • University of Washington

All of these men became experts in their fields by putting in at least 10,000 hours in their craft.

How do I relate to Gladwell’s chapter?

One of the crucial points that Gladwell brings up in The 10,000 Hour Rule is the confidence and experience that you gain from the 10,000 hours you put in. 10,000 hours is going to change you. I realize that with my writing I need to do more of it and I think I need to read more also. I’m not satisfied with where I am with my writing. I’m not passionate about being an expert writer, but I’m passionate on becoming a better writer.

10,000 hours = 1 year, 51 days, and 16 hours

Questions:

  1. Are you an expert or master of a certain skill?
  2. Do you enjoy practicing that skill or do you practice that skill because you’re good at it and it comes easy to you?

Work Cited

Gladwell, Malcolm. “Outliers: The Story of Success.” New York. Little, Brown and Company. 2008.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Reagan Museum Reflection

My top five favorite objects 

Oval Office: I enjoyed the replica of the Office because even though it is pretty much the same it had pieces that showed who Ronald was. For example they had a bowl of Jelly Belly on the coffee table because that was his favorite snack. this really showed that even though the oval office was a place for businesses his little joys still showed trough.

The Visual scene of the Reagan shooting: This had to be my most memorable part of the museum. They had set into a dark room and showed us the clip of the actual shooting. That even though Ronald Reagan has so much protection he was still affected and wounded. This showed that even in life altering situations he still had a strong will about everything and did not let it hold him back. Which says a lot about how he carried himself in his terms as president.

Dedication to Wife Nancy: The little exhibit about Nancy Reagan did not only show us who she was but showed us why she was such a great first lady. It showed us that she led a life of her own and was a strong independent woman and a supportive wife. I remember a part of a quote on the was saying ” Nancy has the features Ronald lacked and Ronald had the features Nancy lacked that together they were unstoppable”. Now this part of the exhibit showed that even though Ronald Reagan was an amazing man and president it was in fact because he had a strong amazing woman by his side. This spoke to me because I believe that a leader should be well rounded and the fact he was such a great husband had to do with why he had a successful presidency.

The Ranch Exhibit (Horse Attire):I enjoyed this part of the museum because it shed light into who he was and what his hobbies were. He had so much dedicated to this part of his life and took so much pride in his horses. Walking around this part of the exhibit showed that he was a normal guy that likes normal thing. Granted he had top of the line everything did not change my opinion or out look that he genuinely enjoyed this hobby.

Air Force 1: I mostly remember air force one being cramped and a little dusty but I do remember how the lady presenting shared quit a funny story with us. She had said that Ronald Reagan would look to see if it was anybody’s birthday on the plane just so he could have a piece of chocolate cake. That this was the only way Nancy would let him eat cake. I don’t think this was the entire reason. Ronald was such a nice person that he probably hoped to make that person stuck on the plane with him feel better by acknowledging their birthday.


The visual scene of the attempt on Ronald Reagan’s Life

The curator probably chose to present this visual scene to create sympathy within the audience. I responded to this visual scene with empathy for the wounded president. Which is most likely the responses wanted by the curator because this was the first serious or tragic even shown to the audience in the museum.

This reaction creates an emotional connection with the president based on the fact that we saw the attack take action and then saw what came after. Which then carries the narrative into a more serious tone. This exhibit was in fact the entrance into the more important issues he faced in his terms.


Discovery of the Truth

With this particular scene shown in the museum we were able to relive it. The shooting was captured in live happening so it is certainly the truth. This scene certainly represents a time in Reagan’s history where he may have not been to popular with the audience. It also portrayed him to be a light hearted forgiving person. He did not let this set him back or make him bitter he in fact prospered from this event.

 

Chapter 4 Reading!

Reading chapter 4 was quite controversial. Chapter 4 basically talked about whether technology is making us dumber? at the beginning of the chapter I didn’t necessarily agree with the statement, but I did think of ways how social media, television, and the use of technology can take away from our learning. However, I began to think about it deeper, and if technology only has a negative effect on teens and children. What really stood out for me were the results of some research studies on teens and television use. There didn’t seem to be a strong correlation between television viewing and educational displacement. Middle and lower class teens appeared to have better grade point averages than the higher class teens whom watched less television then them. Also, I was shocked to learn about the IQ scores improvement compared to the 1970s. These studies made me think a lot about what really other than technology really affects student achievement and success?

Reality vs the Media’s perception

Sorry for the late reply, I’ve been beyond sick and left my computer up at my dorm.

You know if you think about it Media has always been broadcasting the poor different ways. I have noticed more and more as I watch the news that it depends on the channel how  some people talk about the poor.  I’ve noticed watching the news that most the time they are looking aren’t spending to much time on it anymore, its now a lot about celebrities or scandals and around this time politics; why not the things the people running for office keep talking about. Another factor I’ve notice is that fact that you don’t see many white poor people either; I noticed a few days ago that most the time when poor is highlighted its african Americans that are shown on tv in the poor settings. I know maybe I’m kinda getting off topic, but its kinda what I see in the media.

Never Let the Truth Stand in the Way of a Good Story

BRIEF SUMMARY:

Williams’ essay tells the story of three different writing mindsets: the journalist, the writer, and the teacher, and how Williams knows about all three firsthand. Williams’ journalist self stems from his desire to get into journalism when he was very young. He was always taught “Accuracy, accuracy, accuracy,” yet he wanted to tell his story. He believed that a journalist had the ability to skew the story in a way that reflected them as a writer, as a storyteller. Williams’ voice as a writer was much more liberal; nevertheless, like his role in journalism, he capitalizes upon the importance of the truth. The example he uses is when he writes a story based on real people in his life. Like, with his journalism, he tells a story, his story. The last voice is his voice as an instructor. He tells his students that truth is a social construct and isn’t necessarily objective, jumping off his previous points that it is a writer’s duty to tell his story, going back to both journalism and writing.

All three points touch upon one common idea: that a writer does not just present a story, they tell the story in their own way, even if it means it is not entirely true. The idea of truth is not an objective one; everyone has their truth to tell, and the writer tells his or hers. Both journalists and writers are storytellers; however, it is their differing prerogatives that separate them by title.

SSB95WY[1]

This cartoon is a good example from the journalist side of this story, yet it does hold the main idea of the article. Journalists and the media have been known to be synonymous with one another. Their job is to inform the masses, yet nowadays, it is not common to be delivered purely unbiased news. Each journalist, each newspaper, each news station has their own bias and isn’t afraid to complement their story with their own agenda and beliefs. In fact, reporters from the three biggest cable news networks (MSNBC, Fox News, and CNN) have been accused multiple times of pushing their own bias. Williams backs this idea up when he states: “It’s not that people are trying to lie…it is simply that we all construct our perceptions and memories based on our experiences, our desires, and our cultural expectations” (298). Truth is subjective, contrary to popular belief and everyone tells their own, true or not.

 

your-truth-and-my-truth[1]

This image sums up the idea of Williams’ essay very nicely. It is not known who originally said this quote. The quote emphasizes the idea that not everybody will hold the same truth. Each one of us holds our own perspective and sees the world through our own eyes.

MY OWN BELIEFS

In my life, like Williams, I have been taught under the rule that one should always tell the truth. I have grown up believing that there was only one truth. Reading this article put a lot into perspective for me. I never thought of viewing the truth as a social construct, as being subjective, as being a viewpoint. However, I have to say I agree with Williams upon thinking of the media, telling the same story yet a different one. This idea is especially relevant today, being just a year away from electing our forty-fifth president. Many presidential candidates will be telling their truths, and they definitely will not coincide with those of their opponents.

This idea has been important in my writing, personally. When I was in high school, I was not as good of a writer as I was today. My sophomore English teacher was able to hit on the head what I was doing wrong. She pointed out to me that I use too much summary in my papers; I just reiterate ideas. She wanted to see my personal touch in my writings, through my own words and beliefs. In subsequent papers, I offered more analysis and commentary, putting my own skewed view on my assignments. I noticed that I got much better grades than I have before. I have utilized this method in my college papers and have seen my GPA increase more and more. In this case, I was telling my truth, my story. The subject is irrelevant; I have utilized this method in essays about Ronald Reagan and short stories for subsequent English classes, and I have still seen the same positive feedback.

I feel that this subject ties well in our discussion on fiction and that the placement of this article in the semester was apropos. While not always “truth,” fiction is all about telling stories to inform and entertain the masses. This objective is exactly how the journalist, the writer, and the teacher are described by Williams. They offer their wisdom to the world; they tell their stories. Williams’ uses truth in his fictitious story; he bases it on his own experiences, and it is quite obvious to the people who read it. We are storytellers, on both paper and in person, and our truth is our own.

 

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

  1. In terms of writing, is there truly such a thing as “unbiased?” Why or why not?
  2. Can “truth” exist in fiction? Why or why not?

 

WORKS CITED

Hirschfield, Neal. “Teaching Cops to See.” Smithsonian Magazine. October 2009. Web. 4 Oct 2015.

Williams, Bronwyn. “Never Let the Truth Stand in the Way of a Good Story: A Work for Three Voices.” College English (Jan., 2003) 290-304. Web.