November 9th

let me begin by saying this is by far the most interesting article thus far. I’m intrigued because we as communication major,s are learning daily still the influences media has on not only ourselves but, on the younger generations behind us. As I’m reading the article I’m blown away when it says something like  studies have not  documented the relationship between media literacy and food advertising.What! As we know media literacy for children will help them identify what and why commercials are being targeted towards them. It can also educate them that child hood obesity is serious and that they as children are at great risk. At some pint these kids might be shopping with their parents and say ” they package that box of cereal like that because..” kids are sponges and if we teach them they will learn. I think if there is no evidence that it’s working then someone isn’t  teaching it right. I believe that we must continue to early  educate the youth on media  literacy. If some parents aren’t willing to be mindful of what junk they buy their kids then at least kids can help themselves by knowing that they are the target of companies wanting to make profit and don’t care about them being obese. I understand blame is put on the parents but their are so many factors of why childhood obesity happens but the choice is made when we buy those non nutritional items at the store and then continue to go eat at fast food because the house hold is tired fro a long day at work. I buy lots of fruit and my daughter loves it.

play time

I agree with the article by Harris and Bargh on multiple points. Television is a very persuasive tool used by these food companies. When a child sees a giant cartoon pitcher of Cool Aide doing all sorts different extreme sports they are going to think that drinking Cool Aide is the way to be cool or a cartoon leprechaun flying around eating marshmallows in his cereal, I mean how fun is that in the morning? With all the ads on television in the faces of our children it is an uphill battle and I think it really comes down to parents giving their kids healthy meals. That said its not easy to make sure your kid is eating healthy all the time but the most important thing is to set a good example as parents. What your kid sees you do they will want to do so eating healthy is hard but a great thing it start off the bat with young children and that will make dessert so much better. Unless your a grandparent and they just do whatever they want. The commercials on channels for kids are bright and loud and they seem to hypnotize the children. Getting out and playing with them will help with both of these things, they won’t be watching T.V. and they will be working all that unhealthy food out of their system. Get out play for 60 minutes a day.

Session 11: Media Health Hazards?

Childhood and teen obesity levels have risen substantially in the last 30 years.  The 2009 U.S. NIH studies reported by Harris and Bargh do not definitively prove direct causal effects between TV watching and obesity (also called adiposity, I just learned).  However, the write-up concluded by suggesting that parents “restrict the amount of commercial television that their children watch, beginning at an early age.”   Restricting TV watching reduces children’s exposure to unhealthy messages on television, and appears to be the most direct means to reduce unhealthy diet (Harris).  Limiting TV also gets kids off the couch.  Since this study, Michelle Obama has been passionate about children’s health.  Her website encourages healthy eating and physical activity:  Letsmove.gov.

In the Harris writeup, media literacy was regarded as a great tool against advertisements for unhealthy eating.  The research correlated parents’ critical involvement with children’s TV viewing to a decrease in the consumption of unhealthy foods.  Parents can devalue television and media for children at a young age.  This helps kids prefer other activities as they age.

The study also showed that humans are prone to eat things that they consider tasty, but that environment can help determine what is tasty.   “Humans possess an innate preference for sweet, high-fat and salty foods, and a reluctance to try unfamiliar foods.  However,  “repeated exposure increases liking of disliked foods and information that a new food tastes good, increased willingness to try the food.”   To translate, parents that consistently provide healthy eating choices at home will help children begin liking those healthy foods.

One interesting study showed that children preferred food that was packaged in McDonalds wrappers, even if it wasn’t McDonalds food.  Ah, the power of media.

Sternheimer, through Chapter 8 of Connecting Social Problems, again points away from media as the key cause of obesity.  She suggests that children in poverty have less supervision and turn to the television and food for comfort.  The poor don’t have access to public parks and extra curricular activities.  But the poor are only 20% of the US population.  Rich kids and middle class children are also overweight.

For me, the most damning sentence was Sternhehimer’s on page 211:  Ironically, the rise of feminism coincided with increased attention to weight.”  The rise of feminism has also coincided with the great rise of childhood obesity.  When both parents work, who is watching the children?  Who is sitting with them to decipher the messages of media?  Who is helping them get outside and move their bodies, instead of watching hours of TV, alone and unsupervised?  Could the feminist devaluation of homemaking and childcare be a leading cause of childhood obesity and eating disorders today?

Pipeline Repairs Will Take A Loooong Time

News is just breaking that the repair of the embattled trunk line delivering crude oil from Refugio’s onshore distribution facility to refineries in Kern County that ruptured last May and caused the Refugio Oil Spill may take a long, long time to repair.

While I have found such estimates to almost assuredly be overblown, the sheer order of magnitude (years) is quite noteworthy here and speaks to aging infrastructure that may not have been as well maintained as we would all like to think.  The infrastructure crisis in the U.S. in not just a government issue: the private sector can be similarly cheap.  We last, most dramatically, saw this with BP’s “run to failure” policy in Alaska and across various other global oil production units.

An aerial photo of the section of pipeline that ruptured on May 19, 2015 and ultimately sent crude oil into the ocean at Refugio State Beach. Federal investigators found  extensive corrosion in that section of pipe. Image: John Wiley.

An aerial photo of the section of pipeline that ruptured on May 19, 2015 and ultimately sent crude oil into the ocean at Refugio State Beach. Federal investigators found extensive corrosion in that section of pipe. Image: John Wiley.

From the Pacific Coast Business Times:

excerpted from Alex Kacik’s November 5th 2015 piece Refugio oil spill pipeline might take five years to get back online

 

The pipeline that was responsible for the Refugio oil spill in May could take up to five years to get back online and the best-case scenario is 18 to 24 months, according to California Economic Forecast Director Mark Schniepp.

He spoke to a room full of the biggest oil players in Santa Barbara County, public officials and members of the Chumash on Nov. 5 about Santa Maria and the region’s economic future, which are inextricably tied to the oil and gas industry.

If Houston-based Plains All American Pipeline’s Line 901 remains dormant over the next three years, Santa Barbara County could lose out on an estimated $74 million, Schniepp told about 100 people at the Economic Action Summit at the Radisson in Santa Maria.

The county would potentially miss out on about $5 million in federal royalties, $37 million In property taxes, 155 jobs and $32 million in worker income.

“This could probably be expedited and, given the economic impacts I’m about to show you, it ought to be expedited,” Schniepp said about making Line 901 operational. “There are a lot of claimants losing a lot of dollars and will lose them going forward.”

…Exxon is the region’s biggest oil operator, producing nearly 30,000 barrels per day that generated nearly $1.2 billion in revenue last year. Exxon was on pace to make an estimated $636 million in Santa Barbara County in 2015, Schniepp said, but it has only generated an estimated $216.6 million because production was shut down after the May oil spill. About 65 jobs may be transferred to other Exxon facilities, he said

Santa Barbara County recently rejected Exxon’s emergency application to truck oil to refineries because the company did not prove that an emergency exists, the county said.

“It seems that we should probably do what we can do to get things up and running in order to enjoy the benefits we had prior to the shut down,” Schniepp said. “People are going to feel it.”

…Since the oil spill, public officials have called for more vigilant pipeline regulation, requiring the use of new technology and improving oil spill response. Gov. Jerry Brown signed three bills that require the California Fire Marshall to review oil pipeline conditions every year, not every five years as mandated by more lax federal regulations; aim to make oil spill response faster and more effective; and force intrastate pipelines to use the best-known technology such as automatic shutoff valves. Line 901 is an interstate pipeline.

Protected: Does HCAHPS Improve or Hinder the Quality of Patient Care?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: