Blog #4: Metaphors
My first metaphor of choice is “A Thousand Rules and Three Principles”, meaning that writers often get writer’s block because they try to follow so many rules, but there are only three real principles you need to abide by. Basically the principles state that you should write what your are passionate about, tell and show the story, and conform to the audience/ purpose you are writing for (4, Reid). In my writing I often get distracted by all the guidelines I am supposed to follow from previous teachers and my professors now, so I at times get very overwhelmed with all I am required to incorporate into my writing.
“Lost Money and Thank-You Notes: What’s in an Audience” demonstrates that with everything you write, including thank-you notes you have to write for your specific audience and secondary audience.For example, if you were writing a thank-you note to your grandma it would be informal and more personable; verses a thank-you note to a professor or boss would be formal and professional. It’s forming your writing to fit the audience and what is being asked of you. While I was in Girl Scouts we had to write short letters to friends and family to let them know I was selling cookies, if you made the letter more personable or explained what the cookie money was going towards you were more likely to receive an order.
“Fruit Jell-O: Balancing Arguments & Examples” illustrates that good writing is a balancing act between your arguments and evidence. If you have too many arguments your text becomes very boring and bland and too much evidence or reasoning makes your reader confused about the point of the piece. I find this metaphor to be very useful to keep in mind throughout my writing because I sometimes get carried away with presenting too many arguments and not explaining them as well as I should have. This at times creates an issue upon my writing because it makes what I’m writing very dull and my audience loses interest. So I recognize that using the Jell-O act of balancing is both beneficial to me as a writer and to my audience.
“Wash-and-wear Paragraph” refers to very difficult task of trying to decide how long your paragraphs should be and all those rules your professors told you to follow while writing. It is important to keep in mind that every paragraph is different and serves a particular need in your paper, much like different loads of laundry. Throughout school every teacher had a different rule for writing paragraphs, mostly saying that your paragraph had to be a certain length. Writing a paragraph and having it in the back of your mind that it needs to be X amount sentence is often overwhelming, but this metaphor explains that paragraphs need to meet only the requirement of stating your idea and keeping your reader the loop.
My final metaphor is “Hey Hey Hey and the Textbook Conspiracy: Annotating Your Reading”, this metaphor explains the benefits of writing while you read. When you make notes in the margin of the text your reading or all over the page you are fully processing and analyzing what you are reading. It enhances your reading and you become a better writer if you are able to sort out the most important things in the text you are reading. My freshman year of high school my teacher always nagged the class to annotate while we read and I remember hating it because it does require more work and time. After not annotating for multiple passages and books we read, I came to the conclusion that it easier to annotate now while reading then having to go back and reread the entire passage because you forgot the key points.
Works Cited
Reid, E. Shelley. “Ten Ways To Think About Writing: Metaphoric Musings for College Writing Students.” Ed. Charles Lowe and Pavel Zemliansky. Vol. 2. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor P, 2011. 3-23. Writing Spaces. Web. 17 Feb. 2016.






d suffer. Of course, I always had students who broke the rule and I had to address it with them; I should clarify… I have had issues with undergraduate and master’s level students exercising poor judgement with technology. I even recently had a student who claimed to be taking notes when it appeared to me that she was typing at the “wrong times” and looking down at her crotch for long periods of time (where her phone was). I gave her a stern warning and told her that I would be removing participation points. She went back to her regular behavior that night in class. Policing technology use takes my energy away from teaching and well, it just becomes a major source of frustration. Clearly, my approach was not working. But I hadn’t decided how I would or should adjust my approach — yet.
take almost verbatim notes, but most of the studies show that this behavior only enables them to be able to regurgitate facts. When asked conceptual questions — like about the MEANING of what they heard, they fell behind those who used pen and paper (Hembroke & Gay, 2003; Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014). Fried (2008) also found that laptop use distracts both users and their peers…. not good news for tech in the classroom. However, , I should clarify that these studies looked at classes that use lecture as the primary mode of instruction and lecture (on its own, with no learner engagement) has proven to be one of the least effective teaching strategies (Halpern & Hakel, 2003).
; enhanced active exploratory learning, more meaningful interactions between students and with instructor (Barak, Lipson, and Lerman, 2006)
; higher participation, more interest in learning, and greater motivation to perform well (Trimmel & Bachmann, 2004)
; and even the opportunity for students to use instant messaging to make comments or ask questions “silently” (Granberg and Witte, 2005)
. These studies were not conducted in lecture-only classes, they were done in classes where technology was deliberately integrated.
drink legally; I need to believe they’re mature enough to make appropriate decisions on how they wish to devote their attention in class. Plus, if I’m actively engaging them in the course content, hopefully they won’t have to try to hard to make the right decision. I believe my job is to educate them with the resources to make the best decision, and then let them be. So, like Seiber (Fischman, 2009) did in her study, I plan to show them the research on the impact of irresponsible technology use so they CAN make a responsible decision. Then, I plan to let students be responsible for their own behavior. Policing over.