Episode 3

Conflict and cohesion is written all over the third episode. It begins with affective conflict combined with Procedural conflict, the example being Drew giving up on the idea to contribute to the groups method in strengthening their hut, their living arrangement because of future concerns, storms being one of them. He chose to be lazy and not be a team player, it caused tension and members expressed their feelings.

We then face procedural conflict from a previous alliance formed but results exposed till this episode when Jeremy notices that his wife was no longer in the competition and was voted off the island. The promise was between John and Jeremy which was to protect each others wife, that was not the case in this circumstance. It brought tension and words were expressed. Jeremy expresses his feeling of betrayal from John which in a way back fires for John showing his alliance that he had never mentioned this strategy to them, this allows for others in his tribe to see that he continues to be sneaky and playing behind others backs.

The conflict continues but towards the tribes, back and forth with each other especially during and after one of the challenges. It became physical and aggressive throughout the challenge to the point where it became done on purpose. Affective conflict took a lead and showed more of its meaning while words were exchanged out of anger from John past and beliefs to statements he had previously mentioned as once being an athlete which shocked people in the opposite tribe and they decided to voice their thoughts.

 

Go wash a car, Drew.

My favorite episode so far, “We’re a Hot Mess” ends with a bang that no one saw coming, the self proclaimed “Kingpin” Drew goes home. (haha)

As the group gets closer to the merge it is imperative that alliances are made and those who should not be in the game, are gone. After Drew throws the immunity challenge and this leads to a huge uproar within Hunapu. Drew wants Kelly out, Jeremy wants Keith out and the rest don’t know what to do. This is a great example of Substantive Conflict. The group cant come to a clear consensus as what to do.

One of the main conflicts going on is between Jeremy and Keith.  Keith got a clue that the idol was near the well near their camp, when Keith could not find the idol he automatically assumes Jeremy has it and goes on to tell the others. Where he went wrong is that the others went and told Jeremy what Keith had been saying. Jeremy, taking this accusation as an attack he is immediately no longer in alliance with Keith but rather gunning for him instead.

Affirmative Conflict would have to be  the Drew and Kelly situation. Drew throws a challenge so they have to go to tribal counsel in an attempt to start offing the females. Drew taking the lead as the head of the tribe works against him and in the end, he is voted out and blindsided by the women.

Another little thing I found interesting was during the challenges they have the visual explanation for the viewers at home using a real person, in this visual they use a female member of the blue tribe making all of their baskets, then  Hunapu ends up actually  being the winner, possible foreshadow? You decide.

The only negative aspect of Drew leaving would have to be one of my own personal interests which would have to be that I would have liked to see the two brothers, Drew and Alek go against each other in a head to head reward challenge .

Blog#6: Gender and Sexual Orientation

Last class began with instructions from Julian on how to write an outline. I believe this will come in handy, especially in this class where we must write an outline for credit. I have been writing outlines for years, so this wasn’t exactly new to me, but it stressed the importance of doing so. Regardless of how long I have been writing outlines, I could always use tips and this activity showed me a more concise way to write an outline. I know I will use this in the near future. Afterwards, we attended what Jaimie called an “Awareness Fair”. We split up into four groups and went through four scenarios together to simulate various disabilities. They were mostly reading, learning and intellectual disabilities such as seeing how one with eye impairment feels or someone with dyslexia. Then we split into two groups; one activity involved taking a wheel chair across the building and the other simulated Autism by having each of us read with distractions. All of the activities gave me insight, a small glimpse, as to how someone with a disability might feel on a daily basis, in and outside of the classroom setting. I can understand how frustrating at times it may be. The wheelchair activity was powerful because it showed me how inaccessible the Bell Tower is. This in turn got me thinking about how other schools might be the same and that if it isn’t brought to the school’s attention they might not realize how inaccessible parts of their campus might be. The other activity also opened my eyes. I have always been fairly good at paying attention to multiple things and focusing on one, but this activity proved difficult. I never realized how truly difficult simply focusing on one task might be for someone with a disability such as Autism. We then had a discussion about the reading and whether disability is part of diversity. Disabilities are in fact underrepresented and it has become evident that schools do the minimal to accommodate students with disabilities. This past week has made me realize how students with disabilities face discrimination in various ways and has got me thinking what I can do to help change things.

 

This week’s readings centered on Gender and Sexual Orientation in Education. I honestly don’t know why someone’s sexual orientation is such an issue, whether in regards to marriage or education. The readings sparked some anger in me as to why certain people are being secluded based upon their gender or sexual orientation. Education should be equal for everyone. Chapter 9 in Diversity in Higher Education focused on Gender Equity in Higher Education. It discussed the various gender gaps in education and discussed reasons why certain genders might be applying more so for certain majors based on a multitude of factors. I just recently watched a movie that was set years ago at an all-girls school and many of the girls were getting married because “that was what a woman was supposed to do” in their eyes. Education also steers female and males into different directions and that has created gaps. Chapter 10 talked about LGBT Students, Faculty, and Staff. I grew up with a best friend who is out about his sexual orientation and liking the same sex. For me, it is shocking as to why anyone wouldn’t be accepting of another based on that fact, but it does happen and much too often. There is a history in the LGBT community and I enjoy watching movies such as Milk, but am also saddened that it is even an issue. I have always heard about LGBT on campus, as brought up in the book, but I have never attended. Partly because of the label of the group and not wanting people to group me as “lesbian” even though I am not and would go to support my friends. I like the point the book makes on creating a group with less label to accept all students for diversity. Beyond a Binary: The Lives of Gender-Nonconforming Youth showed me how different it is to grow up now than it was years ago. We have more resources and more students coming out that can help support students today. Although I am sad that many have had to suffer and still do, it gives me hope that there is growing support. I can’t even begin to imagine the feelings brought up in the readings, of feeling gender different at a young age. I can relate somewhat because I had a friend who hadn’t come out until high school and I remember how terrified he was to come out to his mother and friends, yet how much support he got from everyone, as well as some not to supportive looks from strangers. It is true, as this article mentions, that you must restructure relationships when you come out. The next reading, Lipstick and Labcoats: Undergraduate Women’s Gender Negotiation in STEM Fields, discusses the experiences of women in undergraduate education, the changes that they have made, and the impacts it has had. There are various explanations set forth, such as biological, social, structural and psychological. It is no secret that men and women are socialized differently from birth and impacts them later in life, including their educational career. This reading conducted studies in order to get a better idea on the topic. There are different pressures put on each gender and, as demonstrated in the reading, it follows them through college and beyond. Lastly, there was a short article online about a Ventura high school choosing not to allow Chick-Fil-A to participate in their fundraiser. It is clearly a touchy subject and I understand their choice in not allowing them and I also understand the other side’s point on including them would be demonstrating inclusion and not seclusion. Overall, I enjoyed the readings and learned a lot although it was very thick.

 

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Blue Team lost due to Drew

In this weeks episode Yellow team finally won their first challenge was safe from going to tribal council. They actually worked together and cheered each other on and with out John in their tribe seems to have less drama and fights within their tribe. So taking out John really did help them out in the end. BUT! Did they really win because they came together? Maybe… or Maybe not.

The blue team lost their first challenge this week, however they didn’t deserve to lose because Drew threw away the game because he wanted to go  to tribal council to take out Kellie. There was much conflict between the girls and Drew, Drew thought he could control the tribe by throwing away the game and taking out the girls one at a time making it an all mans game. The men were all over the place when it came to choosing who to take out, but the women knew exactly who they wanted to take out and that was Drew. Drew was confident that he wasn’t going home this week and when his name was called five times he was voted out, sending him home.

I think now that the Blue team went to tribal council they know what type of team they are and what they needed to do in order to make thing fair and that was sending Drew home. Drew never pulled his load and wanted to sleep all day. When it came to the games he did his part but them he was done thinking that was all he needed to do. In the end I believe sending him home was a good thing. Now maybe the games could be won fairly.

Episode 4 post #3

In episode four “Were a hot mess”  for once I felt like the show has taken more of a  focus on tribe Hanaphu with things finally starting to go south for them. The show starts off right away with Hanaphu finding the flint that they lost and  having conflicts over if they should try to bargain with the host Jeff Crossword for some of their old fishing gear.  I thought that the whole episode had examples of substantive conflicts because the whole time the show was focused on Hanaphu and how they couldn’t come to an agreement on any  issues and decisions. For example, when the whole tribe was trying to get their shelter better situated not everyone agreed on who should be doing what and they ended up being frustrated with  drew  for sleeping and not doing  anything productive around the camp.

In the middle of the episode I thought that Keith and Jeremy were in a affective conflict because Jeremy thought that Keith and him were both alliances but Keith went around to the other tribe members and told them that they should be careful to trust Jeremy because he had an idle.  When Jeremy found out  he decided to try to take Keith out of the game next.  Another type of conflict was procedural conflict because Hanaphu could not decide as a tribe who to vote out after they had lost a challenge for the first time against Coyopa. When they lost I thought the whole team just flipped upside down. Hanaphu went from being a tribe that was very friendly with each other to being very agitated and confused with no one knowing who to vote for in elimination.

When all the chaos was happening with Hanaphu Drew and Kelly were in a destructive conflict because Kelly was insulting drew because he couldn’t get over the fishing gear and she was verbally attacking him over it. I personally thought that it had a lot to do with him getting eliminated at the end of the episode.  Although Kelly did talk a lot of crap about Drew I have to say that I probably would have done the same because Drew really had  an avoidance conflict style. Drew has this style because he would always be unwilling to accomplish anything that would contribute to his tribe or achieving any of their goals. This episode was very entertaining to watch since we finally go to see some drama from the other tribe and I hope that we get to see more in the next episode.

 

Episode 4 Blog #3 Hot Mess

Now that John was eliminated in the last  episode  the game continues. Hanahpu found the flint after they  had already replaced it with a second flint and they want the fishing gear because they  are starving. Drew  has an idea to exchange the second flint for the fishing gear  and that is  when substantive  conflict occurs  because everyone else thinks it is  a dumb idea to ask Jeff Crossword. Everyone  in the Hanahpu  tribe knows  that Jeff will say no except for Drew since Jeff had said no the last time they tried  to exchange their  reward. An example of affective conflict is  when Jeremy and Keith in the Hanahpu tribe. They have differences  in personalities and communication styles because Keith told the group that Jeremy had an idle when in reality Keith had it and when Jeremy found out he  was disappointed because  he felt that Keith should of asked him if he had  the idle not the whole group. I think that Keith should of asked Jeremy  if he really had an idle because Jeremy didn’t even have it and Keith ended up looking bad.

An example of  Procedural conflicts  is when it was Hanahpus’ turn to eliminate someone and a disagreement among the group members was made. The disagreement was when Keith told everyone that they should  eliminate Jeremy for having an idle. Drew told  the guys to eliminate Kelly because he felt that she was  a competition while everyone disagreed.Jeremy wanted them to eliminate Keith for telling everyone that he had an idle when in reality he didn’t. The  girls didn’t like the idea that Kelly should be  eliminated so they wanted Drew  to be eliminated. When Hanahpu  showed up for elimination everyone showed constructive conflict because they didn’t know who to choose to eliminate and they all wanted someone different  to leave the group. With everyone arguing over  who should  of  left this caused  destructive conflict. If drew would of not said that Kelly should of not been the target for elimination then he  would of had a higher chance of staying. This  episode was really intense and I liked it I just hope  that  the  next episode is just as intense.

 

 

 

 

A procedural conflict is when

Survival of the Witt-est

In this episode did a recap of all of the turmoil that has happened in the past episodes. One of the recurring themes is that Coyopa tribe has never won and their group remained in turmoil.

When the episode begins Dale comes back from exile islands and hopes that he will not be isolated from the group and comes back to make sure he will be included. Meanwhile at Hunaphu tribe  Natalie found their flint and Drew decided he wanted hatch a plan but this lead to his and their down-fail. Their conflict relates to chapter 8 on cohesion and conflict. During this episode many tribe members in both groups thought they were being wise in plotting and building alliances.

During this episode it was a hot mess for the Hunaphu tribe as the episode was titled. It mainly steamed to the fact that Dale come back from exile islands a stirred up some drama by saying that Jeremy had an immunity idol when he did not and then Drew grew some Survivor ego and decided to do was best for the tribe but  it was what was mainly what was best for him. Due to both of them stirring up drama it cause d the Hunaphu tribe to succumb to Group-think. This showed their cohesiveness that eventually lead to their deterioration because they all began to plot and decide on who they want to possible vote out. I found it particularly interesting that Drew thought that he was the King pin and was had the most wits and that would help him win survivor but in the end his plan backfired on him. The group-think of their tribe prevented from questioning why the were going to vote out members that were totally non-threatening and follow the “normal” procedure of discussing things before going to tribal council so that they were not a hot mess.

The AEIOU conflict relates to the Hunaphu tribe as well. First A; the could have asked their members what their intentions were because most of them meant well expect Drew who was looking out for himself. Second E; Expressed their feelings because some of the members were clearly offended by things that were said about each other and the fact that they were even being put up for vote. Third  I; Identify what they wanted to happen with the group since this was some of their first experience with alliances and going council since Drew threw their immunity challenge. Fourth O; outcomes of what they wanted to happen in their tribe and lastly U; understand they all have one goal in mind to progress as far as they can on Survivor.

Due to them not recognizing their group-think patterns and identifying ways they could have fixed their conflicts the Hunaphu tribe just made an embarrassment of themselves in this episode. Some members of the group that that their wits would help them but it actually lead to their downfall and lack of group cohesion.

“We’re a Hot Mess” Blog#3

The Hanahpu tribe experienced abundant amounts of conflict throughout the fourth episode. From the beginning, Drew was creating tension by repeatedly suggesting to ask Jeff for the fishing gear that they had to decline from the last episodes challenge. After one of the members found the flint by the camp fire, Drew insisted on trying to persuade Jeff for the fishing gear while the other group members wanted to just move on.  This began to create substantive conflict between the members by having the members disagree with Drew’s ideas and actions.  Tension began to arise when Keith, who was supposed to be in an alliance with Jeremy, blamed him for having the idol. Keith’s accusations about Jeremy began to spread leaving Jeremy to find out from another tribe member what Keith had been accusing him of. Feeling betrayed, Jeremy decided to place Keith as the person he would vote to leave the island. Drew, causing affective and destructive conflict while assuming he was the leader of the tribe, purposely threw the challenge, causing the Hunahpu tribe to lose the challenge. This was in order to get rid of some of the “snakes” in his tribe. Little did he know, Drew struggles lead to a few members hidden agendas of voting him out.  Immediately after the challenge, the Hunahpu tribe members began to secretly consult with one another on who to boot off the island. After listening to every ones opinion, it was clear that everyone was not on the same page when it came to their individual votes. The tribe members seemed to have their own opinion when it came to who to vote off the island creating a feeling of unease. Finally, the group members were able to compromise on one individual that had to go. Drew’s confidence ended up getting him voted off the island.

Survivor Episode 3

It starts with Drew from the blue squad being apathetic around his group, which does not bode well for him in the future. The groups come together and it becomes apparent that John didn’t keep his promise to Jeremy to keep his wife safe. Jeremy now wants him out, and his girlfriend counterpart knows that she is in trouble. John admits to everyone that he made a deal with the enemy and spread the seed of doubt about him. The orange team ended up winning the challenge and got fishing gear. John proved useful for getting fish and everything was going swimmingly, no pun intended. The guys alliance was still strong and Baylor was on the chopping block. That is until the next challenge unfolded and orange team lost, yet again. After their loss, the blue team was taunting and hollering about getting rid of John, who apparently was some shadow leader. Due to his sordid past regarding homophobia and racist comments, the people in the group started to see him in a whole new light. At this point, alliances shifted and people started to have a direct conflict with whom they should vote off. I find it very ironic that the most dynamic conflict throughout the entire episode was the blue group harassing the one guy. It was a great look at how much power Jeremy had for himself, because with one word from him, the group fell in line. At this point, due to fear of destructive conflict, they eliminate the most destructive seeming person on their team despite the fact that he was a lot more good than bad. I guess perception is a hard thing to gauge in that sort of setting. At the tribal council, a lot had been said through subtext so that only certain people would understand. After which, the voting commenced and the tribe voted off John who decided against using his idol. The group most likely feels that they will have a shift in the right direction with this blindsided spectacle but I believe that this will affect them way more negatively than they can realize. At the first mistake, people will start to think that everyone might be trying to blindside them so alliances will be very blurry. In all reality, they may self destruct a lot faster than they realize, but that will remain to be seen. Ultimately, they decided who to vote out using a third party spectator, the blue team, so they have now expressed that they are very weak and very impressionable. It will be a tough road for the orange team now.