Survivor Blog 8

During this late stage of the game leadership becomes a big deal, leading alliances is key to making progress to the end of the game and ultimately accomplishing their goal of victory. In the latest episode two members of the winning team of the reward challenge gave up their positions on a yacht with food and drinks to two members of the losing team. They played this off as a caring gift when in actuality they used it as a strategic maneuver. By gifting their reward to two members that were not yet in their alliance they gained favor with them and solidified their support in the upcoming votes. It also gave them the ability to vote one of their own members onto exile island to try and find the hidden immunity Idol to benefit their allegiance.  Not only was this a bold play in the game it was a strong showing of leadership by the two members that sacrificed their reward for the betterment of their alliance.

Many other aspects of this game show a laissez-faire style of leadership in the groups, even with the formation of alliances the dissolution of the two groups into one single group makes the group more of a free for all. Although they all strive for one goal it is mutually exclusive, only one of them may win, and so no one is obligated to work together for objectives. Therefore when it comes to meeting needs of the group on the island decisions are often left to the individual and the group no longer seems to be concerned about reaching a consensus on what actions to take for the group. The only agreements the groups try to make at this point in the game is who they will vote to remove from the islands and even this is ultimately left up to each individual survivor.

Jeremy, the leader.

This episode, we got to see what happens when a leadership position is vacated. With the exit of Josh, Reed was the obvious emergent leader to take his place for that side of the tribe, though his leadership didn’t seem very organized throughout this episode. A game was played where one member tries to knock off the other into a pool of mud. The reward for the winning team was a trip on a yacht with sandwiches and drinks. The yellow team won the challenge. Both Jeremy and Natalie gave up their rewards to John and Jaclyn.

This demonstrated a portion of the 5M model of leadership effectiveness in how Jeremy contributed to group motivation. Since John and Jaclyn switched to his team in the last episode, he appropriately rewarded the members of his group for their contribution to the group. Natalie stated that the reason for them trading was because they showed loyalty and they wanted to reward them for that loyalty. This also showed some model leadership qualities as well. The reward was a way of praising them for their contribution. One of the ways to model leadership is to publicly praise group members not only within the group but also to others outside the group. This was very prevalent in this moment.

When reading the chapter, I also found the section about gender in leadership very interesting and relevant in this episode. Men have been the primary leaders in the most recent episodes. Even Natalie is seen as a support to Jeremy even though she displays some of the same leadership characteristics.

A Wrinkle in the Plan ~ Episode 8

With the surprising departure of Julie in Episode 7, I was shocked and unsure of what would happen in episode 8. Josh and Jeremy tried to salvage their alliances. From the begining of the episode it seemed that Jon and Jaclyn were on the fence about which alliance they were going to choose. All of the younger players (Baylor, Wes, and Alec) just seemed to get more annoying.

In this episode, I really saw the course material relate to this week’s lecture. The Group motivation was extremely apparent During the challenge for the taco bar. The groups both encouraged their members to get the challenge done. I saw the episode relate a lot to the four categories of Motivation:

  1. A sense of meaningfulness- Everyone tried their hardest to get the challenge completed so they could win.
  2. A sense of choice- Jon and Jaclyn had the most relying on them this week; the way they voted could change the outcomes of future alliances.
  3. A sense of competence- I saw this in everyone this week, except for maybe Baylor. She annoys me and I really wanted her to go home.
  4. A sense of progress- By the end of the episode, I sensed that everyone in Jeremy’s alliance felt a sense of progress when they were finally able to vote Josh out.

Here comes the rain.

Tonights chaper is all about leadership. In this blog we will go over the episode as well as connect it to chapter five of Working in Groups by Isa N. Engleberg and Dianna R. Wynn.

First we start out with the reward challenge, Jacklyn is pinned against Natalie, John agianst Jeremy, Baylor against her mom, and Keith against Alan. Everyone ends up muddy and yellow goes home with a win! One turn is when Natalie and Jeremy give their rewards to Jacklyn and John to show them they are thankful for being loyal in Tribal Counsel.

I would look at that as a form of personal power, Jacklyn and John have found themselves on a yacht eating sandwiches, they have shown their individual characteristics and have been seen as loyal, they have earned status within their group. (Engleberg and Wynn, pg 105)

During the elimination challenge, the tribe members must stack blocks with their feet. Baylor ends up winning the immunity challenge and ends up winning positional power within the tribes. she was won immunity, her power comes from her new status within the tribes. (Engleberg and Wynn, pg 105)

Can I also say, John is really using his power of the idol to rock theo boat.  Jeremy believes that John has the idol, John swears he doesnt but now that Jeremy has spoken his mind John wants to get rid of Jeremy. This is truly mind blowing to me! After everything Jeremy did for John, allowing him to take his spot on the yacht, then spending the night on Exile Island, John is truly the leader here in my opinion.

As the elimination round is up, John and Jacklyn’s power shows to be validated as Jeremy goes home. As it was said by the host, “tonight was both brutal and beautiful”, I think this fit perfectly.

Wrinkle in the Leadership Plan

In the eighth episode of survivor there was a wrench in the plan with Julie going home. Originally the tribe plan was to vote Jeremy off of the island due to him seeming in control. Jeremy is seen as the leader of the pack and Josh is considered a leader also.  Jeremy seems to have come to be the leader by motivating team players and by being strong in challenges even though he has failed at some challenges he still manages to show strength Josh seems to have emerged as leader by interacting and gaining peoples trust. Jon and Jaclyn are attempting to strategize to become leaders by manipulating other tribe member’s trust and appearing to side with people but their goal is to vote Jeremy off early in the episode. The episode begins with a reward challenge the two tribes are split up and mixed to compete for a taco feast with beers and margaritas. Keith Reed Jeremy Natalie and Wes win the challenge and decide to send John exile and this separates him from his girlfriend Jacqueline which may foil there plan if John is not around to interact prior to the next vote. At the reward meal Keith throws out the fact that when Julie left he was left without a strategy but Jeremy is displayed narrating separately that he knew that they planned to vote him off. Jeremy has s power position and is playing the game sternly knowing he is in a leadership position. Back at the other tribe meeting Josh is beginning to exercise his power to feel out the tribe members he is sitting with that lost the reward challenge. I will have to see what other blogs post about the rest of the episode but as of now it is clear that there are leaders rising Josh , Jeremy as well as John and Jac. They are motivating group members to make decisions they are modeling leadership we will see if they are effective.

SO FAR…

So far on this season in survivor this was my favorite episode. It had a lot going on. First of all- after winning the first challenge Natalie and Jeremy make a drastic decision to give up their reward to show their gratitude to Jon and Jacyln for aligning with them and taking out josh in the previous council. A very bold and strategic move, everyone assumed that alliance is locked in. Jeremy is also strategically prepared to go to exile island, where he hopes to find the idol. Although leadership and actually being the leader can be very different it is obvious that Jeremy has a plan and seems to be leading his alliance in the direction they want to be heading, but a few things disrupt his seemingly sure advance. First of all while on exile island, Jeremy searches high and low for the idol, which leads him to believe Jon actually found the idol (which he did).

In survivor so  many aspects are important, not only leadership, endurance, and ability, but strategy is essential. To me Jeremy has been so concerned with leading the pack and keeping himself at the top of his alliance, he failed to stop the betrayal that he was working so hard to prevent. After his strategic move to get Jon and Jaclyn on his side by giving up the boat/feast reward he thought he was golden, but after Jon realized that  Jeremy was suspecting him of actually being in possession of the idol, Jon’s gratitude for taking Jeremy’s place on the boat was long forgotten. Although Jeremy was trying to promote leadership by taking such a big hit for his team, in hopes to further their advances, it ended up being the end of his time on survivor when in a split second Jon became convincing enough to the rest of alliance that it was time to send Jeremy packing.

I think Jeremy could be defined as a leader and for the people he wants to be aligned with he may display a form of leadership, in the sense during the council when Jaclyn is voicing her opinion about how the guys on the other alliance ignored her as soon as Jon was out of the picture, Jeremy added how he wouldn’t do that and treats Jaclyn as an individual, which I think was definitely another tactic just to keep people on “team Jeremy.”

In the end Jeremy was voted off and didn’t see it coming, I think he was clever and his leadership skills did benefit him but most of his competitors saw these characteristics as threats and recognized Jeremy for the strong player he was. I think if Jeremy hadn’t been so involved and gave up his “leader” position he might still be in the game.

Trait Leader? Maybe Not So Much

Although each member is now playing individual in Survivor, for the most part, the members are still in alliances, which ultimately create groups. For example, in one group we have Jeremy, Natalie, John and Jacklyn. I argue that from the very beginning of the season, Jeremy has been a trait leader and he has demonstrated several forms of power including persuasive and charismatic power. Trait leader is defined in the book as a leader who is born instead of made.

Although it could be that he was taught him leadership skills, to me he always given me the impression of a natural leader. His persuasive and charismatic personality seems natural. For example, from the beginning people were trying to form alliances with him and he even expressed he felt like the “prom king.” His title of being a firefighter also gave me legitimate power, which is power from a job title. Especially at the beginning of the season, this title gave him the credibility of being physically trained and it carried on throughout the season. However, this did not save him from being eliminated.

Natalie and Jeremy showed Reward power when they traded their winning spot to John and Jacklyn. Reward power comes from giving out resources valued by members. Natalie and Jeremy though that by giving them these resources, they would guarantee their loyalty, strengthen their group/alliance and have better chances of being saved. Little did they know in this case that the reward power did not work because of the rules of the game.

Keith showed coercive power. In one of the scenes he says, “if anything I will play my idol and vote Josh out” Coercive power is power through having control and dealing out sanctions and punishments. He is trying to play the game by threatening to punish those against him, especially because he has an idol. This also gives him legitimate power because the idol was assigned and it gives him the upper hand if he plays his cards right.

For next episode, I am excited to see Natalie’s reaction and how she will handle the group tension!

SURVIVOR BLOG POST #8

In this Episode, It actually starts off with a recap of the last season but it relates directly to the chapter because in the last episode John was trying to be a leader for his tribe and tried to trick Jacqueline and John into thinking they had an alliance. It actually turned to bite him in the butt because Josh tried to vote out the designated leader, Jeremy, but instead he got voted off by the tribe.

In this episodes challenge the tribe divided into two teams and each team decided who went first. In my opinion I believe this symbolizes leadership as well because they have to strategize who will lead best in certain areas of the challenge. The first member from each team were the more skinny more balanced tribe members.After, followed the women leaders of each team. Next was the strongest tribe members from each team which is a good example of how the text book describes the power of power.

What I thought what was really powerful in this episode was how Natalie and Jeremy gave up their huge feast for winning the challenge because in their opinion they felt like they deserved it. I believe this demonstrates true leadership because they both showed what it was to care ultimately, and this will most likely motivate the members to not vote them out as fast. They are trying to gain leadership amongst as many tribe members as possible which is a very good strategy in my opinion.

Strong Armed

This episode added an expected twist to the season, because one of the most influential characters on the show was given the good old fashioned boot. JEremy was a strong character that showed many of the signs of leadership that we discuss in the chapter.

While after our class discussion i realize that we do not agree on all the same traits that leaders display, it became quite obvious that jeremy was a candidate for the leader position. He was physically strong and fairly sharp as well as charismatic and appeared to be well liked. However i believe that the other characters had a bit of cohesion and knew that if he continued on the show for much longer he would be a threat.

The  longer the characters have been on the show together we see more shifts in power, and the persuasion of all different characters. We see that bonds are formed that the the communication can become more personal, i also believe that this gives everyone a better chance to deceive each other. If one of the characters performs a well thought out lie, it tends to be more believable.

As far as my personal feeling toward the show goes they are mixed. I suppose that i am beginning to enjoy the show as i am more curious as to who will win. However i feel that many of the scenarios are not as dramatic as they actually appear. However this is all speculation, and i am assuming that all of the characters are very anxious to win or lose the big prize.  Whatever does occur, i am sure that we will have some good old fashioned american entertainment.

Survivor Blog Post #8

This survivor episode got me mad. John has turned very selfish. In this episode relates again to our communication, especially leadership. John wants to become the leader. Him and everyone else are intimidated by Jeremy who seems to be the leader and the most strongest player in the team. Everyone rest in the team want wants to vote either Jeremy or Keith out, mostly Jeremy. In the challenge they had, Jeremy’s team won. Their prize was a ride on a ship with food and drinks. Natalie was on the Jeremy’s team and chose to give her position to John. Then Jeremy chose to give his spot to Jaclyn. I was surprised, but more surprised by Jeremy cause he knows John doesn’t want him. Jeremy shows that he is a good leader, looking out for everyone, and a strong competitor.In return, the winning team sends out Jeremy to exile island, that was wrong i believe. When John went to exile island he found the immunity piece but he didn’t tell anyone. He didn’t even bother to tell Jeremy who was looking like crazy. John wants to be the leader that he only cares about himself, he didn’t appreciate the favor that Jeremy did. That why in a challenge you cant trust anyone cause no one has your back. Reed on the other hand is against Keith, he goes through his bag and finds a clue to immunity so he realizes that Keith has the other immunity and goes around telling everyone. His intention is to vote Keith out and form alliance with the rest so he can be safe. At the end there are arguments between Reed John and Keith. But Jeremy gets voted out. Sometimes the strongest member of the group can be the biggest enemy because the rest of the team members want to be the leader.