Be aware of children watching

In the chapter, is popular culture really ruining childhood? I found it very interesting how their are certain ways children should experience their childhood , versus how they actually do experience it. this chapter and article really got me being aware of things that happen and occur while kids watch. and for the article the concepts of stereotyping and generalizing people really got me aware of what social media I support or watch. I found it interesting  as well when they mentioned using generalizations and some stereotypes, as they will become more of a joke, or for comedy, even when these comments are said they usually are being influenced upon children. I just believe we need t be more aware of what impact we influence on children.

They Said it was Their Freedom to Discriminate…

In 1966, it was almost 350 years after the introduction of slavery in our country and 100 years after the end of the Civil War.  Rights were a touchy subject for both black and white Americans. People were scared for their families and for themselves, it was a dangerous time to be alive then. Riots, protests, murder, and discrimination was taking place especially in places in the South like Mississippi and Alamba. Organizations like the Ku Klux Klan made several attempts to stop the movement through violence, fear, and murder. Black African Americans started to be segregated to the northern ghettos and uprising started to occur. People didn’t take one breath for granted and fought with everything they had for their freedom.

Through reading the letters written to Congressman Bizz Johnson, I realized that the public was truly split upon the idea of the Civil Rights Movement. Most of my letters were written by women, but there was also a few written by men. Interestingly enough the responses to these letters by Bizz Johnson were dull and generic.

One of the letters was written by Tony Thornberry, who was a teacher in Jackson, Mississippi. He explained respectfully to Congressman Johnson that he did not think it was right that the Civil Rights movement was making students suffer from violence. Thornberry then went on to say that a young man named “Samuel Young was recently murdered and that Federal Marshalls should be there to defend the people”. Being a student I can see where Thornberry is coming from because one of the most important things is feeling safe at school.

Another letter that I read was from a young woman named Virginia Burris. The letters were pretty equally split upon the views of civil rights, Burris was not in support of it. She told the Congressman that the civil rights movement caused the realization of the race barrier and there is now prejudice because of it; when in fact the fight for civil rights began long before the government took action. Thr most powerful and offensive thing she said was, “I cherish my freedom to choose; if you will, the freedom to discriminate”.

The Civil Rights Movement was an era that brought people together to fight for what they believe in, it had powerful leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X. Many opposed them and tried everything they could to tear them down but they rose above to create a better life for future generations. These letters written to Bizz Johnson were an influential piece of the history at this time, they reflect the public’s views on one of the most important times in history.

IMG_2316IMG_2317

*all references are made from the Bizz Johnson collection at CSU Channel Islands

Protected: To code or not to code

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Cambodian Operation

On May 10, 1970 Boris Pash of Chico, California wrote a letter to the members of Congress which included Harold T. “Bizz” Johnson in response to the “Cambodian Operation”  and his opinion on the display of enemy flags and symbols. The Cambodian operation took place in the 1970’s in which the US invaded the Cambodian territory. In the article he asks the readers to direct their attention to article 3, section 3 of the constitution when dealing with pro Vietnam protestors.

Boris Pash believed that the actions of President Nixon in the Cambodian operation were correct. In May of 1970 President Nixon let the world know on national television that the US was going to be invading Cambodia in order to stop supplies from being sent into to Vietnam and also to get rid of the troops that were hiding out in Cambodia. What the president had failed to mention is that the US had been bombing the Cambodian territory since 1969 without notifying the American people and US Senators. it wasn’t until after the invasion that the public learned about what had been going on in the territory. The letter was written before the additional information was released. The additional information would not have changed the outcome of the letter, because from tactical stand point the actions of the president were justified in Boris Pash’s eyes.

In the letter Boris Pash asks congress to take action and come up with a resolution in order to deal with protestors displaying the flags and symbols of the US enemies. During president Nixon’s announcement there were protestors that displayed the Vietnam flag in order to show support to the Vietnamese Vietcong. Boris Pash asked members of congress to look at section 3, article 3 of the constitution. This part of the constitution talks about treason and states how one could be convicted of treason. Boris Pash believes that people who oppose what the president is doing and are displaying the flag of the United States enemies should be convicted of treason. He believes that there should be something put in place to prevent this, because by displaying these images it empowers the US enemies and is a sign of weakness.

As mentioned early more information was released about what happened during the operations in Cambodia which shed light on what was actually going on and how the the president was handling it. No resolution was ever made regarding treason during this time especially after the additional information was released. Boris Pash urged that members of congress support president Nixon in his efforts in Cambodia however the outcome might not have come out the way he wanted after the information was released.

New Partnerships and Opportunities!

This has been an exciting week! We recently moved into our new lab space at Sierra Hall, and this week was the grand opening. The opening ceremony was led by the university’s president, Dr. Rush, and included the official signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Center of Excellence for Unmanned Technology.The MOU allows our organizations to share resources, and work together in the vetting and use of unmanned systems in research and resource management.

 

Photo Credit: http://www.itsaliveco.com/

The next day, we went to the CSU Channel Islands Boating center, where we met with several key members of leadership from NOAA National Marine Sanctuaries divisions from all over the United States, along with several industry leaders in unmanned technologies. We discussed the current technologies available both above and under the water, and the future of using unmanned systems for research, management and protection of the nation’s oceans, and coastal resources. There were industry names such as AeroVironment, Boeing, Liquid Robotics, Ocean Aero, and much more. We were able to compare progress, and foster new ideas for moving unmanned technologies forward.

 

Team leader Paul Spaur had the opportunity to compare his home built mapping fixed wing, the Snowy Plover, to the commercial platform produced by AeroVironment.
Team leader Paul Spaur had the opportunity to compare his home built mapping fixed wing, the Snowy Plover, to the commercial platform produced by AeroVironment.

Civil Rights

As my research in University 198 continues, I have been provided with a lens to 1966 in the form of more letters from Bizz Johnson’s constituents. All of the letters that I had the opportunity to observe were posted between June and July of that year and were all opposed to the passage of the bill H.R 14765. Though I would like to hope that today there wouldn’t be such a vehement opposition to equality in housing, this was sadly not the case for all of those writing in and declaring their hatred for this bill.

The timing of these letters corresponds with the increased presence and aggression of American forces in Vietnam, giving credence to the notion that with troubles overseas come movements and troubles here at home. While the violence rose overseas, violence in turn rose in the United States in the form of race riots and anti-war demonstrations. In this particular case, it is apparent that fear and ignorance have manifested themselves in the form of racism and discrimination against those just in pursuit of a fair chance of a home.

Those who wrote letters in to Senator Johnson expressed their opinions that the loss that they would experience should this bill pass would be clear “discrimination against whites” (as can be seen in the first of the images below). Others saw this as imposing on their freedoms as an American citizen, arguing that one can’t take freedoms from some just to give them to another. In spite of such zealous opinions, Bizz Johnson’s answers (if he himself ever saw the letters at all) were identical and generic, as can be seen on the blue onion paper. Though it is important to have political efficacy, a response like that may make some feel as though their time sending their letter is undervalued. In spite of this, the overwhelming amount of passion people of this time felt for what they believed, whether it was morally right or not, makes this generation seem more passive than anything.

FullSizeRender     IMG_3244     FullSizeRender (1)

 

The Rant of an Angry Citizen

Most people learn about war, treason and consequences from the safety of a classroom or through the pages of a glossy textbook. There were however some who were forcibly removed from everything they knew and shot into the most gruesome job of man, war. This war was known as the Vietnam War but now it’s more commonly and maybe more realistically known as the unwinnable war. During this dollop of war time the government was not listening to it’s patrons. The government essentially put a blindfold on the public eye and told them to trust the system. But, maybe the government was the one wearing the blindfold. If they had listened to and read the rage that the angry citizens were spewing from their mouths maybe, just maybe, the war would’ve ended differently. What the citizens of the Vietnam War were going through and how life really was for them was documented through personal accounts, periodicals, art  and more. It’s through those channels that we can learn the real people’s history.

As a country we have always had the draft as a backup plan or safety net but when it was put to use in the 1960’s it was all too real. Boys not a day older than 18 were up for grabs via their “patriotic duty” to protect the nation. Through the draft came draft dodgers who had limited means to escape this dreaded fate that was pushed on them before they ever had the chance to live. It was the first adult opportunity they had but was ultimately just another choice that was made for them. Around the nation there were a bunch of “18 -year-olds who had about one chance in ten of eventual exclusion from the draft”(“Escaping Draft” 1960). The rest of them didn’t stand a chance. If they didn’t go to war there were only a few options a young man had, “…like going to Canada, having a good lawyer, or being a moviestar”(Jaekel). Although these methods worked for some, these options weren’t available to “…a poor kid from Watts”(Jaekel). It was estimated that 1,430,000 men would reach draft age which was a huge increase compared to the previous years estimation of 1,290,000 (“Escaping Draft” 1960).

IMG_20150825_110452425

With all of these fresh new faces the army “requested a 3,000 increase in monthly draft calls”(“More Man Power Sought by Army” 1955). 3,000 young men? That doesn’t seem like a big number in the grand scheme of war but when you break it down from person to person the potential loss was extraordinary. Each one of those men had a family and a life to start. There was a time when the Army took “10,000 draftees a month” and if that draft increase was to be accepted the draft call would spike to 23,000 people a month(“More Man Power Sought by Army”1955).  At this point in time the government only saw this increased number of men as a new army. They didn’t think about the potential casualties.

Besides the overwhelming dread that most young men felt, throughout the nation there were newspapers and periodicals that were speaking the truth. The papers were the voice of the people. They were filled border to border with political cartoons and opinions. Filled with stats about the opposition of the war they also featured pieces from organized groups that were created with the hope for peace and  covered protests and strikes (Lamert). With all of these things going on it is easy to say that America during the time of the Vietnam War was a very chaotic and rebellious time. In 1959,  Dr. Claude Bissell, President of the University of Toronto was hopeful that his students would go on and do great things in life with an adventurous spirit and  great intellect. But, in the years that followed he drastically changed his opinion. In 1966 he said, “That escalation [in the draft] sparked an increase in anti-war sentiments around the country. Student demonstrations arose on college campuses; draft cards were burned; a few individuals even resorted to self-immolation as their final, dramatic protest”(Caron 28). That doesn’t seem like the same man. What changed were the college students that were no longer apathetic but became critical and committed to their beliefs. In 1964, “the Free Speech Movement was created to battle the administrative policies concerning student political activities”(Caron 2). As a way to gain their political freedom the were  “massive rallies, sit-ins, and a strike that closed the University before the FSM’s objectives were won”(Caron 2). There is nothing more frightening than a college student who has been pushed too far.

 

IMG_20150825_112111665

 

For the citizens who were not in college but had just as much to say, they had the opportunity to write a letter to their local congressman. In 1964, tension was high in the town of Chico, California where John Jaekel was, assumably, vigorously writing a letter to the current senator of the time, Bizz Johnson. He raised a lot of questions about the chatter that he and the people of the nation had been hearing for years.

 

IMG_20150919_134303

With all of these fresh new faces the army “requested a 3,000 increase in monthly draft calls”(“More Man Power Sought by Army” 1955). 3,000 young men? That doesn’t seem like a big number in the grand scheme of war but when you break it down from person to person the potential loss was extraordinary. Each one of those men had a family and a life to start. There was a time when the Army took “10,000 draftees a month” and if that draft increase was to be accepted the draft call would spike to 23,000 people a month(“More Man Power Sought by Army” 1955).  At this point in time the government only saw this increased number of men as a new army. They didn’t think about the potential casualties.

Besides the overwhelming dread that most young men felt, throughout the nation there were newspapers and periodicals that were speaking the truth. The papers were the voice of the people. They were filled border to border with political cartoons and opinions. Filled with stats about the opposition of the war they also featured pieces from organized groups that were created with the hope for peace and  covered protests and strikes (Lamert). With all of these things going on it is easy to say that America during the time of the Vietnam War was a very chaotic and rebellious time. In 1959,  Dr. Claude Bissell, President of the University of Toronto was hopeful that his students would go on and do great things in life with an adventurous spirit and  great intellect. But, in the years that followed he drastically changed his opinion. In 1966 he said, “That escalation [in the draft] sparked an increase in anti-war sentiments around the country. Student demonstrations arose on college campuses; draft cards were burned; a few individuals even resorted to self-immolation as their final, dramatic protest”(Caron 28). That doesn’t seem like the same man. What changed were the college students that were no longer apathetic but became critical and committed to their beliefs. In 1964, “the Free Speech Movement was created to battle the administrative policies concerning student political activities”(Caron 2). As a way to gain their political freedom the were  “massive rallies, sit-ins, and a strike that closed the University before the FSM’s objectives were won”(Caron 2). There is nothing more frightening than a college student who has been pushed too far.(Jaekel). In his letter he states that,

“…You can always find someone to testify to anything you want testified to if you supply the “proper” motivation. Let’s face it, the military would be sorry indeed if it couldn’t make the draftees believe the “gobbledegook”(Jaekel).

He didn’t seem to have much faith in the government. This was a common opinion at this time because a lot of people didn’t believe in what the government was doing anymore. They didn’t trust them to make the right decisions. Right decisions meaning the decisions that were right for the American people not themselves. Jaekel states that he doesn’t trust the “officialesq gobbledegook” that is coming from Washington.

“This may sound abrasive but when one is the recipient of all the rot that has come out from Washington for the last several years and at the same time see the real facts coming through, one senses the ridiculous…the utter horror of sober men who can put out such mass misinformation. The meanwhile trying to justify their own ignorance or deceit as it may well be”(Jaekel).   

Government always says that the people don’t know what they want and I’d have to agree. Most of us nowadays don’t do their homework but as for people in the 1960’s they wanted a voice. They had very real concerns and opinions in the war. So much so, that they took to writing to their local congressman. That is something that you wouldn’t see today. Now you might find a snarky comment on facebook but that’s about it.  

The Vietnam War surely took its toll on the American people. I would like to think that during this time the government learned a lesson on listening to it’s people. This country was founded to escape oppression and it is easy to fall into a power trip thinking that one group without its people can  know what is best. It is also easy for the government to forget that the only reason they have any power is because it was bestowed upon them by their people. America isn’t perfect and our history shows that. I believe however, that the American people will always see injustices and if necessary fight for real change. If the Unwinnable War gave us anything it gave us a stronger united people, political activists, tortured artists and revolutionists. A country could always use a little revolution every now and again.

 

 

Caron, Erin T. “Vietnam War Drama 1966-2008: American Theatrical Responses to the War and its Aftermath”. Diss. University of Southern California, 2010. ProQuest Dissertations &Theses database. Sat. 12 Sep. 2015.

Lambert, Bruce. “Vincent Copeland, 77, Is Dead; Led Anti-War Protests in 1960’s.” New York Times 10June 1993, sec. D: 23. Print.

Jaekel, John Letter to Congressman Harold T. Johnson.. 8 June 1967. Broome Library Harold T. Johnson Collection. Camarillo, CA. 25 August 2015. TS.

“Pentagon Estimates the Chances of 18-Year-Olds Escaping Draft.” New York Times 4 Oct. 1960. Print.

Quarter, Jack. (1970). “The Student Movement of the 1960’s: A Social-Psychological Analysis.”Phd thesis. University of Toronto. Sat. 12 Sep. 2015.

“More Man Power Sought by Army.” New York Times 24 Sept. 1955. Web. 14 Sept. 2015.
John Jaekel Letter to Congressman Harold T. Johnson. Personal photograph by author. 25 August 2015.

Blog #2 — Protecting Children

In Connecting Social Problems and Popular Culture, Sternheimer asks provocative questions in Chapter 2 entitled, “Is Popular Culture Really Ruining Childhood?” On page 22 she asks, “who decides what children should and shouldn’t know (or when they should know it) and whether knowledge itself is dangerous?  Before we convict popular culture, we need to consider whether children and childhood itself have really been damaged.”

I argue that children today are often damaged by the plethoric accessibility of inappropriate media. Children are under siege, pursued as consumers by big business. Pornography and  violent video games are easily accessed media and particularly harmful.  Valued, real relationships with family and friends can suffer because of learned attitudes and behaviors from this damaging entertainment.  Further, addictions can set in, wasting children’s natural gifts and darkening their promising futures.

I submit that families can be “individual ‘forts,’ or separate units” (p35), that shield their children from these real harms of the “larger community”.  Parents must be vigilant in assessing media to determine its value or harm. They must guide their children to pursuits that prepare them for capable and healthy and happy adulthoods.

 

Nursing401 ICU Delirium

“Incidence, risk factors and consequences of ICU delirium” discusses the impacts of delirium in the ICU patient (Ouimet, Kavanagh, Gottfried, & Skrobik, 2007). According to this study, 31.8% of patients reviewed suffered from delirium; delirium was linked to increased ICU stay, longer hospitalization, and increased patient mortality. The risk of delirium was increased in patients who received sedatives and analgesics. Delirium was also more highly associated with hypertension, alcoholism, and severity of illness.

It is interesting to note that this article cited a different study that reported delirium in up to 80% of patients. This is significantly higher than the result of this article, which found an occurrence of 31.8%. This demonstrates potential inconsistencies in scoring tools and inclusion/exclusion criteria across various studies.

As an ICU nurse, I find it very frustrating when there is a discrepancy between what evidence-based literature reports and what is practiced clinically. ICU patients are routinely given sedatives and analgesics to manage pain while patients are on highly invasive and painful therapies such as ventilators, balloon pump therapy, hypothermic therapy, etc. Acknowledging the data presented in the articles reviewed for this week’s discussion, I pose the question regarding potential solutions and alternatives to this problem? Yes, of course we want to wean the patient off sedation as soon as possible, but when critical patient warrants such medications, what is the alternative? Is it potential to reduce delirium more beneficial to a patient than managing the risk of extensive pain or self-extubation?

To share a story that happened just this past week, my unit was caring for a post op open heart patient CABG x3 vessels with extensive pulmonary disease. This patient was extremely hemodynamically unstable, on high ventilator support, and extremely agitated. Without going into much more detail, this patient was on two sedative drips, and still his agitation was uncontrolled. This patient ended up pulling out his endotrachael tube and needed to an emergency reintubation. The surgeon was extremely upset and ordered a third sedative for this patient. Knowing the data associated with sedation and delirium, would this order be beneficial to the patient? Lack of adequate sedation led (in part) to the self-extubation from which could have had fatal consequences.

Ouimet, S. , Kavanagh, B. , Gottfried, S. , & Skrobik, Y. (2007). Incidence, risk factors and consequences of icu delirium. Intensive Care Medicine, 33(1), 66-73.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR)

I had a chance to take care of a patient who had multiple heart problems. He had CABG open hart surgery in the past. Now the patient developed heart valve problems and needed another surgery. However, the doctor stated that last surgery led to a complication that would not allow this patient to have another traditional open-heart surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve replacement surgery was recommended. I was interested to find specific details about this procedure.

I found the article “Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) – pros and cons of keyhole aortic surgery” that compares different approaches to heart surgeries and demonstrates the benefits of the latest approach that is minimally invasive (Kaczmarczyk, et al., 2015). This type of surgery has been evolving for the last twenty years and proves to safe, well-tolerated and efficient method. The authors explain that “minimally invasive” refers to any procedure not performed with a full sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass (Kaczmarczyk, et al., 2015).

There are two main types of MIAVR: partial sternotomy and intercoastal access. Lower hemisternotomy is the most popular partial sternotomy method. It provides excellent access to the heart and its vessels as well as stability of the rim of the upper limbs in postoperative period. Important advantages of this approach also include less surgical trauma, less postoperative bleeding and blood units transfused, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and ICU stay, and less pain. It is however more technologically demanding and can often lead to failure if the surgeon does not have much experience.

Screen Shot 2015-09-19 at 11.13.36 PM

Right anterior minithoracotomy scar vs. full sternotomy scar

References

Kaczmarczyk, M., SzaaÄski, P., Zembala, M., Filipiak, K., Karolak, W., Wojarski, J.,…Embala, M. (2015). Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement – pros and cons of keyhole aortic surgery. Cardiac Surgery, 12(2), 103-110.