Week 13 Work Week Instructions & Extra Credit

Hey Class: Welcome to week 13, our work week for finalizing the leadership learning module.  Please see the Week 13 instruction page: http://ls490.jaimiehoffman.com/week-13-work-week/ Screen Shot 2014-11-16 at 6.15.22 PM

 

Also….  want to earn 20 points extra credit?

Attend the Tunnel of Oppression and submit a reflection.  The event takes place on Wednesday and Thursday, November 19 and 20 from 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. (with a one hour break from 12 p.m. – 1 p.m.) in the Grand Salon.

Sign up to attend the Tunnel of Oppression http://tinyurl.com/CITunnel-of-Oppression2014 . You do not have to sign up in advance but if you don’t, there are no guarantees you will get to go through the Tunnel and it will take much longer.

After attending the event, write a 2-3 page reflection. The reflection should include what you learned through the experience and how it relates to our course content. Be sure to tie in course concepts including at least two citations. Submit your reflection email jaimie.hoffman@csuci.edu by November 24.  No late reflections will be accepted.

Blood Vs. Water Episode 8: Wrinkles and folds.

Episode 8 and Chapter 5. Leadership, power, control and of trust.

In episode 8 Coyopa, The Yellow faction for this episode wins immunity. Since the paring was Jeremy on one end and Josh  on the other end. When the Jersey’s team won it threw yet another curve ball at Josh because Josh wants to control the group and Jeremy is the leader. They win the templing building challenge and Jeremy’s team wins the game. John is voted out and Jacquil is stomped by everyone acting cruel to her.

In chapter 5 we see the situational model by Hersey Blanchard and effectiveness of leadership by Fiedler both speaking on how leaders to members and of how the models work by structure speak yet another sub section called the 5 M. model, motivate, manage, make  and mentor to his or her members.  Out of all this category the most apparent one is model and management.  Two groups one lead by Jeremy who organizes his groups by his trust, the other by Josh who is organizing by mind and assets.

Returning to the episode it is game 2 and its now time to some brain and memorization work. And the most amusing part is the last two standing were Josh and Jeremy. And again Jeremy win. SImply.

Now that threw the structure away from Josh’s plan. He goes to try protect his alliance. The alliance is shaking and now everyone just just Josh’s group but also Jeremy’s group is going a bit awry.

For the chapter I believe the biggest thing is not just the structure or the 5Ms but the diversity . Culture, ethnicity, and other ideals mix this game and competition. And thus it started to work. They started to sway lose it take against it on Baylor. But in the end the focus were on Josh. The first plan was josh and even at a narrow escape of Baylor, Josh is voted out.

Which rebounds back to Jeremy who retakes his command over the group. And now the leadership is now , supposedly, going to be questioned not by individuals but by all the group against Jeremy. Why? Because if Jeremy keeps wining and protected. Jeremy will win the prize and the rest just followed and mentally everyone wants to win the prize so something will go down between the group and Jeremy once more where Jeremy’s leadership will be throttled again.

Blog post 7: Ep. 8: Wrinkle in the Pain

In this week’s episode, Tribe Huyopa was very upset how Julie just quit the game. It really messed up with their plans on who was going to be voted off. Josh was terrified that he was going to get voted off so he tried to get everyone and convince the “leaders” Jon and Jaclyn to be on his side instead of Jeremy’s. Josh started convincing everyone to get Jeremy off, but Jeremy won both immunity challenges. While Jon was sent to Exile island, all the guys were very disrespectful towards all the girls- and even Jaclyn, they didn’t really acknowledge her-only when Jon was there. Jon and Jaclyn were supposed to be on the men’s side but Jaclyn started to disagree with Jon once she saw how they were treating her once he was gone. That created a big problem with knowing who was on whose side. This made it even harder to decide who to vote off. People wanted Baylor off because they said she didnt do anything, some wanted Jeremy off but he kept winning the challenges, and people disliked Alec. I was not too sure who was going to get voted off. I was kind of happy to find out that they all decided to vote off Josh. I know in this game you have to be selfish because you obviously want to win, but I felt that Josh almost thought too highly of himself and was so positive that people would rather have him on the tribe. Josh’s way for solving the problem was to get rid of all the singles that were left and have only couples in Tribe Huyopa. Josh did communicate well- or tried to with everyone in the group, but his leadership skills were not that great and he also never really won any challenges. To solve Tribe Huyopa’s problem they should at least eliminate the members that dont really help the tribe move forward instead of getting rid of the singles and keeping the couples.

Survivor Ep. 7

The episode begins with the orange crew trying to patch things up with the guy they had stabbed in the back, but reparations were not to be made, at least not on any real level. Their creative strategy had its fallout to it and now they’ve received an enemy from it. Sometimes, being upfront and honest is more reliable than the unnecessarily cunning and underhanded play. Mainly because now, their is no love, and no trust to be had. On the other side, the gay dudes plot to relieve Jeremy from the game, but miss their opportunity due to winning the challenges all the time. The reasoning behind the specificity of their target has yet to be fully revealed, but most likely, it’s because people have discovered that he is conniving and manipulative. With that kind of insight into someone’s identity, it becomes hard to overlook that fact when everyone can’t be trusted, except your loved ones. The tribes merge, they rename themselves, and feel out people’s alliances and loyalties with one another. Jeremy and Josh are in a gridlock, probably because they both can tell that they are running the show from the sly. Jeremy believes highly in his own charm and starts sitting pretty with his belief that he’s got a crew that will be with him until the end. Seriously though, that’s crazy naive. People change their  loyalty on a minute to minute framework, and this is the wrong time to get sloppy. Josh decides to push some gears of his own, but it’s clear that they are split 5-7 in their group. Josh attempts to manipulate Bailor using guilt not realizing that she is a sociopath and a self-absorbed user. That plan will crash and burn and he will have to come up with something  better if he wants to sway the tide of war. He realizes that Bailor feigns persuading her mom and let’s the mom think she’s making the decision, when in reality, she is scared to make the hard decisions so she uses her mom as a scapegoat. It’s not that clever but it’s a strong means of pushing the blame away from her, in terms of future votes. Josh attempts to plea with the attractive couple because they are realistically, the only real fence sitters left. Josh says, there are strength in couples, Jeremy is a strong competitor and has a realistic chance of being the winner despite the game being only half over. It seems like the smart way of introducing perspective to a duo that doesn’t have the capacity to think things through. They fade off into the distance to discuss their play. Thankfully, Julie decides to become an enemy of the state by hoarding the little food that they have left. Regardless of the alliances, that crossed the line for many of them and she’s got a real big target on her back now. Realizing that you could potentially be caught, why would someone do that? The hunger must be really, really hard. The challenge begins and it is wildly uninteresting. Eventually, Keith wins. The only thing worth mentioning was the fat grin on Jeremy’s face when Josh lost the challenge. That looked downright evil. I guess I am very biased at this point or the show is pushing me to want to think in a certain way and it’s working. Keith mentions that this vote will show where the alliances stand and he is absolutely right. Julie is all ready to quit but missy tries to string her along, and not very subtly. She has enraged Julie and she has now become a wildcard. It might not matter because the frat dude still seems loyal towards Jeremy taking the numbers out of the equation for Josh. However, there are rumblings of voting off Julie, which may bear fruit. Also, Jeremy lost first, and quickly. Either he’s uncoordinated, or may have played the long con, showing that he won’t sweep the immunity challenges because he’s terrible at them. That would be amazing if it turned out that way, but I’m doubtful on his capacity to think long term strategy. He’s all about the short term, get everyone on his side, and mob rule. That kind of thing rarely works out for dictators. Josh recognizes that the only two really playing the shadow politics of this game are himself and Jeremy. There can be only one winner so whichever one gets out here sets the tone for the direction of this rag tag group of people. So WOW, what a surprise. Jon actually uses his brain and realizes the benefits of taking out Jeremy far outweigh the short term alliance of being with the single people. Let’s see how it plays out though, because deceit is the name of the game and you never know who’s out until the vote. OH DANG! Another curve ball, sort of, Julie officially quit and now it’s about to get really real for some people. Then, no tribe meeting, how anticlimactic. All it did was raise suspense, and the possibility for alliances to change over the course of the next tribal council. Jeremy is comfortable and that could be his downfall, and Josh is wary and willing to get in the dirt to succeed. It seems that for the time being, Josh has better odds, but we’ll see next time around.

Survivor #7

This episode of Survivor didn’t contain a lot of dramatics in terms of different people earning victories and getting the right to remain on the show. I may be wrong but haven’t they always had at least two competitions on each episode?? Maybe that has changed since the merge. Anyway, all the dramatics seemed to take place behind the scenes as everybody is desperately trying to position themselves to not get voted out. Every member of this new group has an agenda and they have demonstrated that most are willing to do whatever they have to do to maintain that agenda. I am new to this show, but since having a several episodes under my belt, I now know that positioning is basically what makes the show. This show is more about how mentally strong you are rather than physically. Problem-solving realities are no different, however they not be the most ethical at times in groups. Like it says in the book “Group decision making in the real world is often messy.” These particular realities consist of politics, preexisting preferences, and power. Politics is eventually going to occur in group problem solving just as it strongly does in Survivor. With politics comes deceit, games, and manipulation.  Most of the members are deceitful and betray the trust of one another as fast as they often give their word of faith that they are in alliance. That’s why I was glad Josh was voted out because he was the primary culprit in telling Baylor that they were on good terms and telling guys like Dale, Wes, and Alec to vote her out. It would have been Jeremy in Baylor’s position but he was able to win the competition. Preexisting preferences refers to “when we encounter something that challenges our beliefs, we often view it as flawed.” This existed between Dale and Missy as both have a different parenting style that conflicts with the other. Dale is critical of Missy’s daughter Baylor being lazy and Missy sticking up for her, while Missy views Dale and his son as chauvinistic. Power is self-explanatory because whoever possesses autonomy within the group usually has the greatest influence in solving problems in the group. For example John and Jackelin are still the power couple.

Survivor Blog Post #7

In episode 8 of Survivor, decision making and problem solving techniques become the key to making effective choices within the group. Similarly to episode 7, at the beginning of the episode Josh tries to convince Baylor to side with him instead of her mother’s and Jeremy’s alliance. He tries to persuade her into voting for Jeremy because he claims that she owes it to him after he had saved her previously in the competition. By adding Baylor to his team, he hopes to solidify more numbers within his own alliance. Also, he believes it will allow him to build a consensus among his alliance members to accomplish the mutual goal of voting Jeremy out of the competition. Josh sees Jeremy as the biggest threat to him in the competition and believes that with enough power, influence, and individuals agreeing with him, everyone’s willingness to achieve the same goal will ultimately force Jeremy to leave. However, Baylor is not phased by his proposal to her and resolves to side with Jeremy’s group instead.

Jacklyn also faces a situation in which she must persuade other individuals to side with her as well. After Jon is chosen to go to Exile Island, Jacklyn realizes that the male alliance they had previously sided with did not value her opinion or input within the group. It soon became apparent that without Jon’s presence, their former alliance had no consideration for her vote at all and ignored her entirely. Her feeling a lack of respect and trust from the group caused her to try to persuade Jon to switch alliances. Jon however, felt skeptical and questioned whether her decision was the right one.

Jacklyn and Jon were then forced to use problem solving techniques in order to come to a solution. They needed to analyze the problem of deciding which alliance was better and weigh out the options. They also needed to debate on the pros and cons of each side. A pro of switching teams that they discussed would be that they would be able to vote out Josh, who was also a strong competitor and leader of their former alliance, which would give them more power. On the other hand, a con they mentioned was that siding with Jeremy may backfire when he could win the competition entirely because his story is more convincing than theirs. Jon and Jacklyn’s decision to strategize with one another ultimately led them to change alliances and vote for Josh at tribal council. In the end, it was the majority vote that caused Josh to be voted out of the competition.

A theme that makes sense for class blogging! I’m more excited than I should be about this.

It’s only taken me most of the semester to figure this out but I’ve finally found a theme that I think is perfect for class blogging.

To provide some context – at the beginning of this semester I had managed to figure out how to syndicate all of my student blogs, how to use categories and aggregate the blogs to a specific page on my class website… Kind of like this…   This looks nifty and I feel cool saying “I aggregate my student blogs onto my class website” but the concern I had/have was that the unorganized, sort of stream of consciousness look, really does not make participation easy for students.  What I mean is that without an easy way to access peers’ blogs, students often default to looking at the last blog posted since that is how they show up in the aggregated blog roll.  I don’t want students to blog for the sake of blogging; I want blogs to serve as an opportunity for collaboration and discussion beyond the walls of the classroom (both for my FTF and OL classes).  The aesthetics of how the blogs appear need to facilitate this interaction as opposed to serve as a barrier… the way I see it is that if it’s difficult to participate using blogs, I may as well use a discussion board.  Along with everyone else, I often get excited about digital tools but I always want to stay grounded in making sure that the use of these tools make sense to achieve the outcomes of the class, assignment, module, etc.

Having said that… I love the idea of requiring students to create a digital identity and enjoy (though sometimes it hurts) helping them build their digital literacy (more about my thoughts on that is here).

I’m excited to share that I found the SOLUTION for making blog posts organized in such a manner that I believe makes the process of student participation easier.  At the beginning of this semester, I located a plugin called Class Blogging that looked JUST like what I wanted but I couldn’t (and didn’t have the time) to figure out how to use it.  Well… today I figured it out and while I have some things I’d like to see updated about the theme that I’m sure some techie person at CI can help me with..hint hint.. (like a dynamic navigation menu or at least sub-items on the menu), I’m SOOO impressed with the Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 2.42.38 PMfunctionality that it provides… check out the list here.  THANK YOU OBERLIN COLLEGE! The plugin comes with additionally functionality I did not know I wanted (like an admin page that calculates word count!).   I’ve enabled this theme and plugin to one of my course websites to share with you.  If anyone knows how to update themes and is willing to work with me, I would love to get help on tweaking this theme a little.

As a side note, I use FeedWordPress to aggregate my student blogs which automatically pushes all of my students to “contributors” to my blog.  This means I can edit their info, including their avatar, in the users section of WP.  I **WISH** I would have been clearer about what I want my students to note as their “display name as” name when they created their blogs because that would have saved me a lot of time editing their names (and figuring out who they are since some got a bit creative with their names). I also realize that if I did not want my students to create their own blog, I could add them as contributors to my blog… yeah… it MIGHT have taken me all semester to figure that out but… the light bulb finally went off.

Now that I feel good about the visual representation of blogs on my course sites, I think I might consider adding another layer of participation to some of my modules by assigning students (or groups) to the role of moderating the week’s blogs.  Oh and… tags… I need to explore those since the Class Blogging theme provides the option to aggregate tags into a word cloud for the class which could not only be cool but could provide a great source of class discussion and could possibly be used for formative assessment.

Blog #7

In the the previous class discussion we had a scenario where we were given a star and tearing them off or keeping the ends according to the script that was being read. I thought it was interesting to see how the people on the stars can sometimes be the ones to turn their backs on us if we tell them that we are gay. I personally had a star that had all the pieces together at the end. But it was interesting to see other people tear theirs off. I can imagine what they were thinking as they were tearing off the names of the people whom they trust the most. Also in one of the previous class we had our presentations about the chapters of the books in The Hope in the Unseen. At first I was a bit nervous of giving a presentation in front of the class, but as I kept going I was feeling less and less nervous. I think the more practice I get  the better.

 

For this weeks reading they were touching basis of the different gender inequalities that still exist between men and women. One of the main ones that was pointed out was the difference of men and women pursuing higher education. One of the most notable examples was how more and more women are pursuing jobs in STEM fields. Whereas before this field was only controlled and dominated by the male individual. It is good to see how women are willing to stand up to this patriarchal world and pursue jobs in a field that is being dominated by masculinity.   Another main idea that was discussed in the reading was the notion of how LGBT students are not being represented well in college institutions. These students feel oppressed because they see it as we only are accepting either males of females in our institutions and no other sex. I think institutions should take an initiative and provide help and other services to make LGBT students feel more welcomed and not feel oppressed to be proud of who they are.

1. Yes we do see more women in STEM field jobs, but how are men reacting to this notion?

2. If LGBT students do no feel welcome in college institutions, is that keeping them from obtaining an education?

3. Will colleges take the initiative  and make LGBT students feel welcomed and accepted and not just writing out propositions that show support for them?

The Complexity of Ethics

Post a link to a current event involving unethical or ethical leadership.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/usc/la-sp-josh-shaw-plaschke-20141113-column.html#page=1

What would take for more people to engage in the ethical actions presented?

I think that it is just people’s conscious and integrity that it takes for people to engage in the ethical actions presented. Although not everyone can see the ethical side of this story (and I can admit that it took me a couple reads through the article to see it myself), when looking at the larger picture, Shaw eventually decided to come clean about his acts, and not everyone would be able to do that.

What actions are needed to change the unethical behavior into ethical behavior?

I think that I use the term integrity loosely in the prior question, as to me integrity means do the right thing at all times, and clearly that is not the first decision Shaw chose when the incident first happened. However, he eventually came around, whether that be because of his integrity or other reasons.

 

Based on your responses to the Core Values Questionnaire, what are your core values?

My core values, according to the questionnaire, are justice and integrity.

To what degree would you say that your actions align with your values?  How would you want to improve in this area?

I think that my actions align with my values often, but definitely have space to be improved. I think that justice is an important value to me, but also covers a lot of areas that can sometimes be overlooked. A way of improvement would be to review all areas/perspectives to keep them all on the “front burner” as often as possible.

Do you think other people know your core values?

I think that people who have worked with me would be able to identify my core values. However, friends that have not worked with me in a professional or even somewhat professional setting would probably not be able to name my core values.

Are you comfortable talking about your core values with others?

Because integrity became a new value that I hold near and dear to my heart within the last 5 years, I try to talk about it as often as possibly and share my personal belief on integrity. I even try to subliminally teach my students (grades 1-5) integrity whenever I get the chance. I have no problem talking about my core values with others.

In your planning for the future (e.g. next five years), how will your values influence what you do?

I think that my values are going to influence what I do daily and positively. I am constantly trying to gain people’s opinions on matters and/or self written definitions to gain perspectives on the values I know I hold for myself to see how I am able to constantly enhance those. With being able to enhance them I have to potential of influencing a child’s life when I work with them.

 

The Complexity of Ethics

Unethical Tweet Of The Month: Andrew Barovick

  1. What would take for more people to engage in the ethical actions presented?
  2. What actions are needed to change the unethical behavior into ethical behavior?

It is somewhat understandable to post something in response after a victory during elections to the opposing candidate. However, the post should not overstep boundaries, it should be considerate as to how others might take the post. Not everybody is going to see or hear what was initially meant by the post. In the article Lawyer Andrew Barovick was under the impression that he was posting a tweet that to him seemed to be somewhat funny, but not offensive. However, although his intentions where not to cause any conflict or to offend anyone, he managed to do both. Having a leadership position within the New York City Bar Association’s Medical Malpractice Committee , his comment was considered to be on a scale from 1-10, to a be a 9. Because he is seen as a leader people expected more from him, especially when they gave him the opportunity to retract from his initial post. In order to change the unethical behavior into an ethical behavior, in this case Mr. Barovick would have to apologize, to the previous post. Although he did resign from his leadership duties, his resignation is not considered to be a form of apology.

Based on your responses to the Core Values Questionnaire, what are your core values?

  1. To what degree would you say that your actions align with your values?  How would you want to improve in this area? I feel like my actions do align with my values. At least for me I always try to look out for those that i consider to be family. As well as making sure that the actions that I take part of are just. The best way in which I can improve in this area would be by considering looking at the big picture without my emotions clouding my judgement. Sometimes I tend to overlook small things when it comes to those that are closest to me.
  2. Do you think other people know your core values? I feel like they are aware of what my core values are.
  3. Are you comfortable talking about your core values with others? I am comfortable in talking with other about my core values with others.
  4. In your planning for the future (e.g. next five years), how will your values influence what you do? In the future I do believe that my core values will influence what I will be doing in the future. Personally my core values have influenced me to pursue a career of education simply because I want to have the opportunity to provide the same opportunity that I received growing up, a good education.